I also won't entertain the idea of auto polarity reversal for the same reason
Dave stated, but then I'm not a commercial enterprise. If I was selling the
stuff, then I would have to consider that option due to production volumes and
time. Something must go somewhere off those electrodes and the only place that
'something' can go is back into the water, however, it won't be immediately
observable due to that polarity reversal switching back and forth. If they are
not removed and cleaned at regular timed intervals to minimise that 'something'
being dispersed in the water, then whatever comes off those electrodes will
remain circulating in the water and end up at the bottom of the storage vessel
after gravity has done its thing.
@ Marshall...Do you ever decant or filter...Yes/No?
N.
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:44:16 -0400
From: mdud...@king-cart.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>Beck blood purifier
Reversing polarity of the electrodes while making CS is an effective
and widely used method of decreasing buildup of silver and oxides of
silver on the electrodes. I have made thousands of gallons of CS,
and I reverse every minute, on a two minute cycle. Reversing
eliminates the dark oxides because the electrode which forms the
oxide is exposed to monoatomic hydrogen during the next half cycle,
and the hydrogen immediately reacts with the oxide reducing the
silver oxide to silver. Also any silver powder that accumulates on
an electrode, either by reduction of silver oxide, or by deposition
of silver from the solution, goes back out on the next half cycle as
well. The result is electrodes which stay amazingly clean and never
need to be cleaned. I can typically make several thousand gallons
of CS on a set of electrodes and have never ever had to clean them.
Also I have never witnessed any silver oxide coming loose due to
polarity switching. If any were to come loose it would be from the
stirring of the water, not a polarity switch.
Marshall
On 10/10/2012 6:31 PM, D B wrote:
The idea of reversing polarity during the
manufacturing process is a very bad idea and obvious design flaw.
Far better to select one electrode, and make a mark at the top
with a pair of pliers, then simply connect it to positive one run
, then negative the next, keeping note of dates you use the
marked electrode with neg or pos current.
The reason for this is that you will accrue a large amount of
dark oxides which should not be disturbed during manufacturing.
If they get into the sol (colloid) then the ions coming of the
electrode will then stick to those chunks and your sol will
bottom out much quicker, the particles also being
less therapeutically beneficial as they will be getting so large
to the point where they will just not be able to pass inside
cell tissue and kill pathogens, also creating more possibility
of argyria skin discolouration, though that can be lessened or
even removed with selenium supplementation to chelate it from
the skin I read. The regular changing of polarity will just push
a load of muck into the distilled water and act as a magnet for
the smaller groups of ions to stick to.
With best wishes, Dave
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:32 AM, HARSHA
GODAVARI <h.godav...@shaw.ca>
wrote:
I am considering using this to make
colloidal silver. I like the idea of reversing polarity
because it will slow down a build_up of CS near one
electrode and both electrodes (hopefully) wear evenly. Also
I have one of these around and it will save a bit for the
time being :-)
Are there any "cons (& pros)" to this notion. I would
appreciate your thoughts on this. Thank you.
regards
hg
No virus found in
this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5322 - Release Date:
10/10/12
