Wow! The 'owners' of yahoo groups are allowed to say what the posters can post 
about and to delete the posts the deviate from that. If any of you know Garnet 
of the LDN and DMSO groups used to be very strict about what could be posted on 
'her' forums. Mike of this forum used to be pretty strict about what people 
were posting on 'his' forum too.
 
The only vested interest these owners have is to help others and keep the 
subjects to the forum interests so it moves smoothly.
 
I suggest you and Cyndi start you own forum and just let it be a free for all.

Sandy
 
--- On Mon, 4/29/13, Dorothy Fitzpatrick <d...@deetroy.org> wrote:


From: Dorothy Fitzpatrick <d...@deetroy.org>
Subject: Re: CS>Silver Sol>
To: "silver-list@eskimo.com" <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Date: Monday, April 29, 2013, 11:16 AM



I agree Cyndi.  I was on a homeopathic list and the list owner would NOT allow 
ANY reference to colloidal silver (EIS) OR any information about how it cured 
so many ailments.  To me this smacks of vested interest.  

I have used EIS on ALL my dogs, and you can’t fake cures with dogs!  There was 
a horrendous enteritis type epidemic in my local park, which had many friends 
dogs in the vets on drips.  Mine were given EIS at the first sign of vomiting 
and/or disinterest in food (always a dire warning of things not right) and were 
cured within a day.  This happened so many times that I am totally sure of the 
internal use power of silver.  Indeed, my dogs never went to the vets at all.  
dee




From: Cyndi <cyndi...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "silver-list@eskimo.com" <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:27:39 -0400
To: "silver-list@eskimo.com" <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: CS>Silver Sol>
Resent-From: "silver-list@eskimo.com" <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:27:55 -0700 (PDT)

   
On 4/29/2013 9:41 AM, Joe Huard wrote:
 
 

 Way to go, Sandy. You covered all of the points that I was thinking of making, 
as I am on that germkiller group also. The list owner is Bob Luhrs who signs as 
baby_grand or bG.
 This might be already suggested, but why not "test" the difference between 
these 2 possible forms of nano silver before coming to the conclusion that 
Silver Sol is just marketing hype? To do that we need a person with an open 
mind who has already experienced CS/EIS and knows how it acts with them. Then, 
compare how Silver Sol acts. 
 I plan to buy some SS to test internally, but I have little experience with CS 
to compare it to.
 
 Joe H.
 

 Why not allow posts defending cs's ability to kill internally on the 
germkiller group? I have direct and personal experience with it. The only 
reason I can think of is that it disproves bg's assumption that it doesn't work 
internally. Why would someone with an open mind not want to hear real life 
proof that cs can reduce a viral load and share it with the group? 
 
 I am totally open minded, want to know what Silver Sol is and what it may do 
for me, but when it's attached to statements that are flat out lies how can I 
trust what that person says? When I refute those lies with personal, factual 
evidence and it's hidden from the group how can I give that person my trust? I 
have viral load tests that show in black and white what happened when I took 
cs. It's totally relevant to the original post and other posts related to SS 
were put through.
 
 What happened was dishonest and definitely slanted towards this other product. 
The list owner isn't encouraging testing them against each other at all. He's 
pushing one while sitting on information about the other.
 
 Cyndi