This sort of statement turns me off, how about you?
"And in spite of the millions of tons of supposedly “toxic” trace silver
contained in the world’s oceans, the sea is literally teeming with
wildlife,..." Thats in the article for red herrings.
Tons of silver without reference to the quantity of water gives no
silver concentration, thus the statement is misleading and devoid of
proof. Whats the name for that kind of logical fallacy? It suggests
there must be a LOT of silver in the ocean, and that animals THRIVE on
it. For an analogy, what is the difference between the dead sea and the
living oceans where life thrives, 'from the smallest microbe to the
largest whale' in 38.5 quadrillion tons of salt? We must be able to
thrive on salty water! Instead we should ask how much silver
concentration is normally in the healthiest ocean water.
"Seawater contains approximately 2-100 ppt of silver, and the surface
concentration may be even lower. River water generally contains
approximately 0.3-1 ppb of silver." 100 ppt is one hundred thousand
times less silver concentration than 10 ppm home brew silver. Dilute
your completely, utterly non toxic and healthy in every way home brew
silver by 100,000 to reach ocean water.
The article suggests the aquarium water be treated for disease with a
silver concentration on the order of 1 ppm. This is about 10,000 times
higher than the silver in the ocean, which is thriving on all those tons
of silver.
Sometimes our "feelings" about something are right, sometimes they
arent. So some people look for actual data
Thanks
Max
On 9/22/2021 5:26 PM, Phil Morrison wrote:
I make and use CS at 10 ppm (parts per million).
At this level CS is entirely safe for people, environment, fish, and
most living things, except pathogens.
I post the following for red herrings:
https://thesilveredge.com/using-colloidal-silver-in-your-fish-tank-or-aquarium/
<https://thesilveredge.com/using-colloidal-silver-in-your-fish-tank-or-aquarium/>
