Thanks, Dean-- Now that I have a definitive explanation, two related questions pester me: What happened to all those Rife freq's, and has anyone compared this kind of zapper's effectiveness to straight DC? --Russ
> Hi Russ, > > On Sun, 19 Nov 2000 12:14:50 -0600, russ e rosser > <russros...@juno.com> wrote: > > >Dean, can you delineate the output specs (or cite a url that lists > them)? > > Is it sq. wave DC pulses? What V, freq? > > The zapper produces square wave DC pulses with roughly a 50% duty > cycle. Clark's original design called for a 9 volt battery power > supply, which produced pulses having about a 5 to 7 volt peak, and a > frequency of 30 kHz. > > Current designs, which are deemed more effective by many people > (including me) use a 12 to 15 volt power supply (car battery voltage > -- nominally 13.5 volts) with pulse peak voltage at about 10 to 12 > volts. These designs also use a lower frequency, with some at about > 11 kHz, while others use 3 kHz or even 1 kHz. My current zapper > varies the frequency from about 1 kHz to about 3 kHz every 2 seconds. > (I added that on 3 days ago, and haven't taken the time to tweak the > circuit so it isn't the frequency range I really want, which is 1 to > 10 khz.) > > Most zappers use a resistor in series with the wands to limit the > output current to roughly 1 to 4 mA. This limiting, of course, will > round off the leading edge of the square wave, which reduces the > power > available in the higher harmonics (that's why I wanted the frequency > sweep -- to hit a wider range of "kill" frequencies with adequate > power). > > The rise time of the square wave should be as fast as possible, but > if > a 555 timer IC is used, there's no worry on that point. > > Several commercial zappers highlight the fact that their zappers > don't > use much power, and a 9-volt battery can last a long time. IMO, > that's getting the zapper idea backwards. > > In order to use little power from a battery, you have to design the > circuit to: 1) put little power into the wands and 2) make the rise > time of the square wave very slow, rounding off the pulse too much, > making the zapper ineffective. I have two "store bought" zappers > like > that -- and they had no effect on my sinus situation. > > >7 on - 20 off...is that seconds? > > No, minutes. > > Clark's protocol is: > Hold the wands in your hands for 7 minutes, > Wait 20-30 minutes, > Hold 7 minutes, > Wait 20-30 minutes, > Hold 7 minutes. > > The reason for the repeats is that larger parasites have smaller > parasites within them. So microscopic worms have bacteria that prey > on them, and killing the worms will release the bacteria. In turn, > bacteria have viruses in them which get released. This has been > reported by Rife, Clark, Naessens and others (and mention has been > made of E. Coli bacteria having an E. Coli virus). > > > -- Dean -- from (almost) Duh Moyn (CDP, KB0ZDF) > > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal > silver. > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message > to: > silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- > silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > Silver-list archive: > http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com> >
