It's the PWT, and so far the CS I make has reduced scaring [ son-in-law had 23 stitches from a car accident, you can barley see the scar] and for burns it eliminates pain and leaves no scars. blessings Ted
Trem wrote: > Hi Ted, > > What Hanna meter are you using? If it's the TDS meter, you'll not get very > good results. If it's the PWT you'll do much better. > > I find it odd that you get zero reading with the distilled water. That > makes me think you probably have the TDS. Distilled water usually reads > from .5 to 2.0 in most when measured with the PWT cases although there are a > few brands in certain parts of the country that are outside those limits. > > Trem > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ted Windsor" <t...@shaw.ca> > To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> > Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 1:39 PM > Subject: Re: CS>Measuring CS strength > > > I realize that there are many who may know more about the technical part > of > > making CS. I have been using CS for several years, and I use a Hanna unit > to > > measure the CS I am making. When I start wit 0 [zero] PPM and when I > remeasure > > the readings read 5 PPM? What are the PPM being measured if not CS? All > I know > > is the CS I make works, and many people send me their thanks for what it > does > > for them. I do not charge for the CS I give away, many times it is for > > children, they seem to get well. What can I say! > > Blessings > > Ted > > > > Trem wrote: > > > > > Hi Bob, > > > > > > Yes, I understand. However, the standard solutions were part of the > package > > > provided by Hanna. The problem was that the readings were NOT > repeatable > > > nor were the results ANYWHERE near the known results which were obtained > > > from Kimball Labs. The unit did not work on CS....period. End of > story. > > > > > > PWT's work much better even if they do not measure the colloidal > portion. > > > At least they can be calibrated with a correction factor to get the > total > > > PPM and the readings are very repeatable. That's what counts for me and > I > > > think for the average user. I'm not interested in measuring CS to the > Nth > > > degree. What I am interested is knowing roughly what the PPM is and I > want > > > it to be fairly accurate and repeatable. That's what I get with the > PWT. > > > As I have mentioned, we use three of them to average the readings when > > > calibrating our generators and to check against each other. They are > almost > > > always the same as far as readings go....within one point or less > usually. > > > > > > Why do you denigrate a very useful tool when it is so inexpensive to buy > and > > > also easy to use. > > > > > > Trem > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: <bober...@postoffice.swbell.net> > > > To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 10:46 AM > > > Subject: Re: CS>Measuring CS strength > > > > > > > Hi Trem, > > > > > > > > I do not care whose spectrophotometer one uses. It must be calibrated > vs a > > > > known standard. > > > > > > > > You might go to the public library and get the video made by UCLA of > > > > spectrophotography. It give a very good explaination of how it works > and > > > what > > > > is required to calibrate one. > > > > > > > > Mine is make by Hach and I use there chemicals but it still had to be > > > > calibrated as wach mahine has its own idiosyncrasies. > > > > > > > > "Ole Bob" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal > silver. > > > > > > > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message > to: > > > > silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com > > > > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > > > > > > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > > > Silver-list archive: > http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
