Dear Tom: Evidently you weren't paying attention. Perhaps you should reread my post again and again until you understand it. You seem to be saying that I claimed CS doesn't work - I don't see that anywhere in my post.
You go on to say that I am "bashing people," "trying so hard it seems to throw a wrench into the works" and "discrediting CS and the people that use it." Once again, reread the post instead of trying to read things into the post. You also made reference to a web site that has nothing to do with the discussion and you went on to ramble about "Bats, Mosquitoes and Dollars." I'm not sure where you were going with that one, but if you would like to take it up on the OT list I would be happy to discuss it further. To refresh your memory, we were discussing the claim that CS kills 600+ pathogens. I said "The statement is probably true, but I've never seen references to the actual lab tests." Perhaps with your excellent research skills, you can find this study and post it to the list. I think we would all like to put this CS urban legend to bed once and for all. Or, If you just want to rant and rave some more about CS, there is a gal named Rosemary Jacobs and a web site called quackwatch that you can be paranoid about. Just don't try and twist my words around. Andy From: Tom Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 07:02:36 Here is an article on Utopia Silvers site from a 1914 Scientific American, while this isn't about all the 650+ pathogens it touches on the "scientific" AND "documented" proof that it does work there is documented proof all over if you look. Also if you want to find the pathogens that it is effective on go out and buy some of the books the some of these sites say their article refrences, back about the time colloidal silver was abandoned (1930s) here in the US in favor of synthesized antibiotics research was being done in the UK on a broad scale of colloidal metals most of these books are used as reference for these articles which is mainly edited information from the same article. There is plenty of proof out there if you decide to look. The UCLA BYU and the University of Noth Texas studies. I haven't been using CS for long but what I have used it on works great as with MSM as well. I don't know if you use CS and I don't care but it bothers me when I see someone who comes into this list making claims that it doesn't work when they themselves have not verified squat wants to know what research what pathogens this that and the other. If you look you will find. When I first started using CS I believe I was questioned about the same thing by you as a matter of fact after I made a mention how good I felt taking CS, and in all honesty I really didn't have answer well now I do, instead of bashing people about it, go and look for yourself, you trying so hard it seems to throw a wrench into the works, do some research yourself, and if you say you can't find anything you are either not looking or just discrediting CS and the people that use it. My advice to everyone is to use the internet, to search these claims, use their bibliographies and order some of these book, you can get them on amazon ,barnes and noble and other online book sites, sometimes you can even get first editions which are a little expensive but nice to have. For instance you can still get this book which our government would like people not to know about. Bats, Mosquitoes and Dollars http://search.ba rnesandnoble.com/booksearch/results.asp?WRD=Bats%2C+Mosquitoes+and+Doll ars&userid=2TX8DV7US7 it explains some diseases and how insects are the carriers and this includes smallpox and contagious it really isn't. When I find this stuff it amazes me that our government and health system would rather poison us with unproven vaccines than to admit cleanliness and sanitation are the reason smallpox has been eradicated. What bothers me even more is that for the most part we as a people actually believe the crap that they tell us. From: ascottsil...@aol.com To: silver-list@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 12:54 AM Subject: Re: CS>CS doesn't work ... Slow down Jay. I know someone once said that CS kills over 600 different pathogens. It has been quoted over and over by unscrupulous CS manufactures, but I don't think the statement has ever been qualified. The statement is probably true, but I've never seen references to the actual lab tests. It's most likely a bad marketing tool. When you see statements like "KILLS OVER 600 DIFFERENT PATHOGENS" on someone's web site, assume they are selling sewer water. If they lie about their claims, they are probably lying about their product. Ask the people who put this crap on their web page things like: Who made this study? When? Where? Where is it published? What strength of CS was used? What specific pathogens? Was a control group used? If someone really spent the time and money to obtain, grow and kill 600 cultures of different pathogens with CS wouldn't you think that it would be published in a scientific journal? Best wishes, Andy (^_^) From: Jay Ice Pretty bold statement....but I can understand where your comeing from. No CS is not a cureall and neither is a medication. There is no all-porpose cure, but what medication do you know that CAN kill over 600 different bacteria/virus and fungus?
