I'd suggest looking at Joy's "Why the future doesn't need us" article in Wired.
For some reason, which isn't clear to me, that article was a huge hit, drawing
in people that normally would never read such stuff. I was surprised when
various educated but non-techie people I know started asking me about it.
I think the major problem is one of time scale. Due to Hollywood everybody
is familiar with the idea of the future containing super powerful intelligent (and
usually evil) computers. So I think the basic concept that these things could
happen in the future is already out there in the popular culture. I think the key
thing is that most people, both Joe six pack and almost all professors I know,
don't think it's going to happen for a really long time --- long enough that it's
not going to affect their lives, or the lives of anybody they know. As such they
aren't all that worried about it. Anyway, I don't think the idea is going to be
taken seriously until something happens that really gives the public a fright.
Shane
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [singularity] Convincing non-techie skeptics that th... deering
- Re: [singularity] Convincing non-techie skeptics th... Mark Nuzzolilo II
- Re: [singularity] Convincing non-techie skeptic... Ben Goertzel
- Re: [singularity] Convincing non-techie skeptics that th... Russell Wallace
- Re: [singularity] Convincing non-techie skeptics that th... Hank Conn
- RE: [singularity] Convincing non-techie skeptics th... Peter Voss
- Re: [singularity] Convincing non-techie skeptic... Ben Goertzel
- Re: [singularity] Convincing non-techie skeptics th... Matt Mahoney
- Re: [singularity] Convincing non-techie skeptic... Josh Treadwell
- Re: [singularity] Convincing non-techie ske... Russell Wallace
- Re: [singularity] Convincing non-techie... Shane Legg
- Re: [singularity] Convincing non-t... Bruce LaDuke
- Re: [singularity] Convincing n... Randall Randall
- Re: [singularity] Convincing n... Bruce LaDuke
- Re: [singularity] Convincing n... Hank Conn
- Re: [singularity] Convincing n... Bruce LaDuke
- Re: [singularity] Convincing n... Anna Taylor
- Re: [singularity] Convincing n... Matt Mahoney
- Re: [singularity] Convincing n... Russell Wallace
- Re: [singularity] Convincing n... Anna Taylor
- Re: [singularity] Convincing n... Russell Wallace
