--- Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 01:35:31PM -0700, Matt Mahoney wrote: > > > None, because we have not defined what AGI is. > > AGI is like porn. I'll know it when I'll see it.
Not really. You recognize porn because you have seen examples of porn and not-porn. If you give a test to people who have never seen porn, I think they would fail. But we will never do this test because of ethical concerns about showing porn for the first time to the only subjects you are likely to find, children. I also don't think you will recognize AGI. You have never seen examples of it. Earlier I posted examples of Google passing the Turing test, but nobody believes that is AGI. If nothing is ever labeled AGI, then nothing ever will be. > > One definition of AGI is passing the Turing test. That will not happen. > A > > machine can just as easily fail by being too smart, too fast, or too > obedient, > > The Turing test implies ability to deceive. If your system can't deceive a > human, > it has failed the test. ELIZA has already passed. So we can all quit and go home now. -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&user_secret=8eb45b07
