On 6/16/07, Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...)
The obvious alternatives, it seems to me, (but please comment), are either
pace the movie 2001, a desk-bound supercomputer like Hal, with perhaps
extended sensors all over the place, even around the world - although that
supercomputer, I guess, could presumably occupy an ever smaller space as
miniaturisation improves.
(...)

Given the ever-distributed nature of processing power, I would suspect
that a superAGI would have no physical form, in the sense that it
would be distributed across many processing nodes around the world.
(And those could be computer clusters, single personal computers, and
so on - if you want to stick to physical forms, probably we are
talking about zillions of boxes of many sizes and shapes.) And despite
being "formless" it would be omnipresent, in the sense that it would
be able to access zillions of sensors (and possibly actuators), from
street surveillance cameras to radiotelescopes.

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&user_secret=7d7fb4d8

Reply via email to