J. Andrew Rogers wrote:

On Apr 6, 2008, at 9:38 AM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
That's surely part of it ... but investors have put big $$ into much LESS
mature projects in areas such as nanotech and quantum computing.


This is because nanotech and quantum computing can be readily and easily packaged as straightforward physical machinery technology, which a lot of people can readily conceptualize even if they do not actually understand it.
AGI too will be on physical machinery. I dare think I am smarter than the average bear but quantum computing makes my head hurt. From what I have read about the field I doubt we are much closer to workable general quantum computing than we are to AGI. AGI makes a lot more conceptual and somewhat detailed sense to me. Nanotech itself has difficulty getting many takers for acheiving full molecular nanotech. Sometimes I have the paranoid idea that the difference is that things that are too disruptive have a MUCH harder time getting funding.
AGI is not a physical touchable technology in the same sense (or even software sense), which is further aggravated by the many irrational memes of woo-ness that surround the idea of consciousness, intelligence, spirituality that the vast majority of investors uncritically subscribe to.
As investors generally seem a hard-headed lot about investment dollars I would be surprised if this is a large factor. I do think there is a "yuk-factor" or a xenophobia of the utterly unknown at work when considering funding of highly disruptive utterly game-changing technology. I have been in conferences of futurists no less where over 70% of the audience raises their hand that they would likely not avail themselves of immortality if it was immediately available! The conservative preservation of the known goes a lot deeper than we credit.

- samantha

-------------------------------------------
singularity
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/11983/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/11983/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&id_secret=101816851-9a120b
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to