Yes, also because older UAS won't send 487 response for INVITE anyway, so the UAC needs to handle this case
Regards, Jeroen M. Rangnathan wrote: > I have the following scenario: > > UAC sends out INVITE > UAS responds with RINGING > UAC sends out CANCEL > UAS does not repsond to CANCEL (for example, it dies). > UAC cancel transaction Times Out. > > Question -- should the UAC also delete the INVITE Client Transaction > that it was originally trying to CANCEL ? ( I think the answer is > "yes" but I want to be sure. ) > > Thanks > > Ranga _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
