Thanks. Should a proxy server also do this action (i.e. Terminate the INVITE if the CANCEL times out?).
Ranga Jeroen van Bemmel wrote: > Yes, also because older UAS won't send 487 response for INVITE anyway, > so the UAC needs to handle this case > > Regards, > Jeroen > > M. Rangnathan wrote: > >> I have the following scenario: >> >> UAC sends out INVITE >> UAS responds with RINGING >> UAC sends out CANCEL >> UAS does not repsond to CANCEL (for example, it dies). >> UAC cancel transaction Times Out. >> >> Question -- should the UAC also delete the INVITE Client Transaction >> that it was originally trying to CANCEL ? ( I think the answer is >> "yes" but I want to be sure. ) >> >> Thanks >> >> Ranga > > > -- M. Ranganathan Advanced Networking Technologies Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8920, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. tel:301 975 3664 , fax:301 590 0932 http://w3.antd.nist.gov/ Advanced Networking Technologies For the People! _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
