Hi Eric,

I also do not understand why it would not be possible to indicate in
the transaction of the initial INVITE what type of INFO is exactly
required/supported (negotiation and subscription stage) and to send
the event information with an INFO during the dialog (notification
stage).

Concerning draft-burger-sip-info-00, I think the draft is not fair
with this poor INFO message.  Indeed, the INFO message helps a lot to
quickly implement/have some features (e.g. full intra requests of
mmusic-xml-media-control, DTMF, MSCML, ...) while waiting for
implementations of the IETF standardized solutions (e.g.
rtcp-feedback, kpml, media-control, ...). Though I agree there are
some cons with features based on INFOs messages, there are also some
pros with this approach, (ie: same as for everything ;-) but I won't
go over such details. Thus, I think that even if the IETF does not
want to recommend the INFO message, the IETF should at least recognize
it for experimental uses (i.e. roughly an equivalent of RTCP APP
packet) and even documents these uses. Otherwise, we can end up with
some types of INFO messages that are broadly used but that are even
not documented within IETF documents (e.g. application/dtmf-relay for
INFO with DTMF)

Xavier



On 7/20/07, Eric Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
12 second proof point of why content type doesn't work.

So here comes an INVITE.  I am an INFO-friendly UAS.  I negotiate by using
Accept.

This INVITE has the line:
Accept: application/kpml-response+xml


Wow!  This is great!  I know the UAC *wants* DTMF.  Why?  Because it accepts
a DTMF content type.  Excellent - I can now send them DTMF.

The user enters a digit, and I send an INFO with type
application/kpml-response+xml.

UAC says, "What the heck was that?"


Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain 
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated 
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or legally 
privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 
named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received 
this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete 
it.


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip



_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to