> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hadriel Kaplan wrote: > > > >> A way around that is to say that if the URI contains b.com, then an SBC > >> acting for b.com, when it knows it won't honor that, can change it to a > >> TEL URI when it exits the domain. It then may well go through another > >> SBC acting for a.com as it enters the a.com domain. That SBC could > >> change the TEL URI to an a.com URI if that will be handled correctly > >> within the a.com domain. > > > > Funny enough I've seen a case where that exactly happens. It seemed > > crazy to me though. > > Its not at all crazy.
Sorry, I should have been clearer - it seemed crazy to me because the two SBC's were connected with a direct fiber, and all responses upstream from b.com were going nowhere but a.com. :) -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
