On May 8, 2008, at 2:27 AM, Jiri Kuthan wrote: > Juha Heinanen wrote: >> Christer Holmberg writes: >> >>> I agree with Hadriel. The idea is to let the client do it, so that >>> the proxy doesn't need to handle it, e.g. by providing short >>> registration refresh timers etc in order to make sure the NAT >>> bindings stay open. >> >> christer, >> >> could you then, please, restrict the scope of your draft to udp >> connected UAs, because if they are tcp connected, clients can keep >> their nat binding open by simply sending double CRLFs. if they get >> back >> single CRLF, then fine, but if they don't, it is fine too. > > True, I didn't realize that, with TCP we don't even need the reverse > CRLF.
Well, without the reverse CRLF, you may not notice for 20 minutes that your connection is down. The TCP stack will take a while to timeout from SYN. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
