Yes I support this work too.
On 26-Mar-09, at 4:16 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:
Hi folks,
Christer has updated the document based on the action item from
Wednesday's SIP session (chaired by SIPPING chairs and modeled as
the proposed DISPATCH WG). If folks could please review the
document and raise any concerns on the document now, that would be
appreciated. We ask specifically for an answer to the question: Do
you support the document being adopted as a WG document in RAI (WG
tbd)? A simple "yes" is fine, however, if you don't think we should
adopt this document, could you please provide the reason.
For your convenience, here's the link to the document:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-sip-keep-04.txt
And, the diff:
http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-sip-keep-03.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-sip-keep-04.txt
tinyurl: http://tinyurl.com/dfyvxz
Regards,
Mary
SIPPING WG co-chair
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] on behalf of Christer Holmberg
Sent: Thu 3/26/2009 12:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
Hi,
I've submitted a new version (-04) of the keep draft.
The requirement text is now alligned with the text shown on the slides
during the SFO SIP WG presentation.
There are no other changes in the document from the previous version.
Regards,
Christer
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
