On Mar 26, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:

Hi folks,

Christer has updated the document based on the action item from Wednesday's SIP session (chaired by SIPPING chairs and modeled as the proposed DISPATCH WG). If folks could please review the document and raise any concerns on the document now, that would be appreciated. We ask specifically for an answer to the question: Do you support the document being adopted as a WG document in RAI (WG tbd)? A simple "yes" is fine, however, if you don't think we should adopt this document, could you please provide the reason.




So, given the outpouring of support, should we pull back the draft- ietf-sip-outbound and re-write it to refer to the keepalive mechanism of this draft instead of containing similar but not identical text?

--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to