Hi, I agree with Francois.
People have been waiting a long time for Outbound, so let's not delay it (and keep) further. Regards, Christer -----Original Message----- From: Francois Audet [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 8:10 PM To: Dean Willis; Mary Barnes Cc: [email protected]; Christer Holmberg; Cullen Jennings Subject: RE: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Dean, There is no reason to do so. There is no "similar but not identical text" in draft-keep. Draft-keep only defines a parameter that allows the usage of the keep-alive defined in draft-ietf-sip-outbound, outside of the context of the registration procedures of draft-ietf-sip-outbound. Currently, the two drafts are carefully choregraphed to be consistent. I don't want to undo this at the last minute. Note that some other drafts in the queue are dependent on draft-ietf-outbound (e.g., draft-ietf-sip-sips). I really don't want us to undo our work for no good reason. I would recommend moving draft-keep swiftly to WG document. I believe it should rapidly move into last call. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Dean Willis > Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 20:54 > To: Barnes, Mary (RICH2:AR00) > Cc: [email protected]; Christer Holmberg > Subject: Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep > > > On Mar 26, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Mary Barnes wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > Christer has updated the document based on the action item from > > Wednesday's SIP session (chaired by SIPPING chairs and > modeled as the > > proposed DISPATCH WG). If folks could please review the > document and > > raise any concerns on the document now, that would be > appreciated. We > > ask specifically for an answer to the question: Do you support the > > document being adopted as a WG document in RAI (WG tbd)? A simple > > "yes" is fine, however, if you don't think we should adopt this > > document, could you please provide the reason. > > > > > > > > So, given the outpouring of support, should we pull back the > draft- ietf-sip-outbound and re-write it to refer to the keepalive > mechanism of this draft instead of containing similar but not > identical text? > > -- > Dean > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > [email protected] for questions on current sip Use > [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
