yes
________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Mary Barnes
Sent: 26 March 2009 23:17
To: Christer Holmberg; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
Hi folks,
Christer has updated the document based on the action item from
Wednesday's SIP session (chaired by SIPPING chairs and modeled as the
proposed DISPATCH WG). If folks could please review the document and
raise any concerns on the document now, that would be appreciated. We
ask specifically for an answer to the question: Do you support the
document being adopted as a WG document in RAI (WG tbd)? A simple "yes"
is fine, however, if you don't think we should adopt this document,
could you please provide the reason.
For your convenience, here's the link to the document:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-sip-keep-04.txt
And, the diff:
http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmb
erg-sip-keep-03.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-sip-kee
p-04.txt
tinyurl: http://tinyurl.com/dfyvxz
Regards,
Mary
SIPPING WG co-chair
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] on behalf of Christer Holmberg
Sent: Thu 3/26/2009 12:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
Hi,
I've submitted a new version (-04) of the keep draft.
The requirement text is now alligned with the text shown on the
slides
during the SFO SIP WG presentation.
There are no other changes in the document from the previous
version.
Regards,
Christer
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
