On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 12:53 -0400, Robert Joly wrote: > > Ad-hoc is not really the way I see this being used. The idea is that > a > multi-user chat would be owned by a user the same way it owns a > conference bridge. This gives a user 'audio' and 'IM' conferencing > capabilities. Furthermore, we are working at strengthening the link > between a user's audio and IM conferencing capabilities by adding the > capability of promoting an IM conference into an 'IM' + 'audio' > conference via a single text command.
I'd go one better than that - I'd make it the default. All conferences should by default have both text and audio media, and be strongly linked. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
