Hi, I am sure the bridge is equally as good if not a better choice than OpenSBC. Having direct configuration link to sipxConfig, I wouldn't doubt the bridges edge over OpenSBC in that regard. However, there might be indeed some problems we have already solved in the OpenSBC that would make it a faster solution now for those who couldn't wait for a rock solid integration of the bridge to sipx mainland. Having said this, so as not to pollute this mailing list with OpenSBC cross posts, I just would want to get peoples sentiment if it is indeed a worth while effort for the OpenSBC project to put more focus on being an alternative SBC for sipX or not. I am willing to create a new mailing list specifically for this effort as a sub group in the OpenSBC project where seamless sipX/OpenSBC integration can be discussed and documented.
Joegen voice wrote: > Hi Joegen > > Long time no speak. Was my email forwarded too you? By the way, I setup a > new server and followed the Linux instruction to compile, which failed. > Could be because your notion of what a usual Linux installation means > without definition is the problem. Or maybe because I'm using Centos5 and > your using Centos4. This should never be an issue. I suggested 2 years > ago that sipX take a look at your OSBC handling of your Java code for SIP > Trunk/B2BUA implementation and might be interesting and speed up their > thinking. They have a very interesting sipXbridge project going on but > taking forever to get it done. Perfect the enemy of the good. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joegen E. Baclor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "voice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org> > Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2008 7:55 PM > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] how to configure sipxecs 3.10 with OpenSBC ? > > > >> If people have use for OpenSBC in this community, I'll be more than >> willing to help out in any way I can. I have just recently released >> OpenSBC 1.1.5 RC1 which already has basic SIP trunking capability. If >> there are enhancements that need to be done to gracefully support sipX >> ECS, I can squeeze it in to the 1.1.6 OSBC roadmap. >> >> Joegen >> >> voice wrote: >> >>> I am willing to help this sub group with setup, configuration and >>> testing OSBC. I have played with it over the last 2 yrs. an abandon >>> it in favor of inGate Firewall/Siparator. Siparator is a great SBC >>> and works like a charm but their never ending licensing mechanisism >>> > sucks. > >>> If anyone is interested call robert 773.244.3782 to setup ground >>> rules. My intent is to correspond via this list and have a working >>> configuration within 1 week. >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipx-users mailing list >>> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users >>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.3/1746 - Release Date: >>> > 10/25/2008 5:55 PM > >>> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.3/1748 - Release Date: 10/26/2008 > 7:53 PM > > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
