And this works for location (branch) based call routing? Josh Patten Assistant Network Administrator Brazos County IT Dept. (979) 361-4676
On 6/22/2010 5:12 AM, Picher, Michael wrote: > Josh, > > I think when I do it I just create a new gateway and use the ip but give > it a different gateway name in sipX. > > I'm pretty sure that works fine. > > Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Josh Patten > Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 4:09 PM > To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Use one IP address for multiple gateways in > sipX? > > Yes I did: Two different A records (not CNAMEs). I set a different > branch for each gateway and made sure the "shared" checkbox was not > checked. The way my system is currently set up is I have one main > "shared" Audiocodes mediant 1000 with a PRI connection to the outside > world. In the dial plan I put all the non-shared gateways that sipX > should try before the main shared gateway (for location based dialing) > in the dial plan order and then add the non-shared "emergency dial" > gateways (in the event the main gateway is down) after the shared > gateway in the dial plan order. > > In the case of the gateway that required two hostnames, I have a need > for two extensions (6177 and 6536) to use that gateway "before" the > shared gateway and another group of extensions to use it "after" the > shared gateway so in the event the audiocodes gateway is unavailable the > > local gateway can be used. What actually happened when I set it up that > way was that all of the extensions that pointed to the two different > hostnames would stop at the first gateway (I am assuming because the IP > matched even though I was using A records) that was supposed to be used > by the two extensions 6177 and 6536. > > Did any of that make sense? What kind of logs should I gather? > > Josh Patten > Assistant Network Administrator > Brazos County IT Dept. > (979) 361-4676 > > > On 6/21/2010 2:30 PM, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote: > >> ________________________________________ >> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org >> > [sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Josh Patten > [jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us] > >> OK this didn't work. The hostname method simply causes sipX to see >> > them > >> as the same gateway so a match on one gateway will be a match on the >> > other. > >> _______________________________________________ >> >> It *ought* to work! Did you use two *different* hostnames whose A >> > records give the same IP address? > >> Dale >> >> > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
