I tried to find the perfect combination of centralized/decentralized for a
similar setup. I wanted centralized for the same reason you wanted. I'm in
healthcare, and we could not have any potential issues with the remote site
dialing out if the T1 to our main office went down. In the end, I couldn't find
a clean way to do it without putting a remote server and FXO in. That was with
4.0.4 though. Maybe some of the new branch features will give you some more
options in this area.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nathaniel Watkins <nwatk...@garrettcounty.org>
Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 08:08:24
To: Tony Graziano<tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net>; maybelater<maybela...@gmx.de>
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org<sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Remote Location - 45 phones - separate server
or not?
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
