sipXBridge will not be an issue with VM. The only issue with VM and
Media Servers like Freeswitch in your case is the accuracy of the timers
used in a VM which will be directly have an affect on audio sampling.
The media anchor is sipXrelay. It does not process nor generate any
media and, thus, will not require multi-media timer accuracy to perform
its function. Hope that clears things up a bit.
Joegen
On Thursday, 23 September, 2010 04:12 PM, Mark Theis wrote:
This is my point. I am looking for the answer. For some reason it
feels like people make comments that do not actually inform me of
anything. SipXbridge is not helping me. But... What would be the best
alternative?
Can someone please give the rest of us some pointers? I know that I
have read all the wiki and I am still lost. Failover and redundancy is
driving me crazy. Does redundant gateways (sip trunks) work?
The wiki has just enough info to nake ne hungry. Any alternative links?
Sorry to rant. Getting very fryustrated.
-Mark
Mark D. Theis
Southern California Telephone & Energy
27515 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula Ca. 92590
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From*: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
<sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org>
*To*: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
<sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
*Cc*: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
<sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org>
*Sent*: Thu Sep 23 00:48:16 2010
*Subject*: Re: [sipx-users] SIP Server Questions (Virtual vs Physical)
R-r-r-r-right, sipxbridge is a-a-a-a-nchoring the m-m-m--media...
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Paul Scheepens <pscheep...@epo.org
<mailto:pscheep...@epo.org>> wrote:
Just a question on the SBC's, as they are handling voice as well,
wouldn't there be a (possible) issue with VM.
TeTeTeTalking with the outside world should be PePePePerfect IMHoHO.
Paul
From: Mark Theis <mth...@socaltelephone.com
<mailto:mth...@socaltelephone.com>>
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
<sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
<mailto:sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>>
Date: 23-09-2010 06:40
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SIP Server Questions (Virtual vs Physical)
Sent by: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
<mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter,
I like your plan. I am not an expert (maybe because I have only
been working with this for a month or so) yet, but…. What were you
thinking to use as your SBC1 and SBC2? Each of your other
devices’ names hinted at (or explicitly said) sipXecs… but the SBC
has me wondering. Are you thinking to have 2 separate ITSP
Gateway (SBC) sipXecs VM’s?
As you might have noticed from my last post a couple minutes ago,
I want to do something very similar to yours… but… all of my users
will be external. And… I have my servers geo-diverse. This may be
a problem for me, but I could not find another solution aside
from sipXecs that claimed the ability to solve my problems.
Thanks!
*Mark Theis*
* *
*Southern California Telephone and Energy*
Office (951) 693-1880 Ext. 212
Fax (951) 693-1550
Cell (951) 545-1013 or (949) 682-VOIP
27515 Enterprise Circle West
Temecula, CA. 92590_
__mth...@socaltelephone.com_
<mailto:mth...@socaltelephone.com?subject=reply%20from%20email%20footer>
*From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
<mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org>
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of
*Talbot, Peter*
Sent:* Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:43 PM*
To:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software*
Subject:* [sipx-users] SIP Server Questions (Virtual vs Physical)
Hi all.
In further pursuing a ‘Production Rollout’ ready implementation of
sipXecs, I had some final questions, mostly in regards to what can
and cannot be Virtualized. Currently it is looking like anything
that actually handles voice traffic (whether recorded messages or
ongoing conversations) should remain physical due to timing
constraints, but other Roles can be Virtualized.
What I am loosely looking at then, in a server layout fashion,
would be something along the lines of:
SIPX1 – Physical Server (Internal network) - Management/Primary
SIP Router
SIPX2 – Physical Server (Internal Network) - Redundant SIP Router
SBC1 – Virtual Server (DMZ) - Primary ITSP Gateway (SBC)
SBC2 – Virtual Server (DMZ) - Redundant ITSP Gateway (SBC)
SIPCN1 – Physical Server (Internal Network) - Conferencing
SIPWM1 – Physical Server (Internal Network) - Voicemail
SIPX3 – Virtual Server (Internal Network) - ACD/Instant Messaging
Physical and Virtual Servers would all be 64bit, running a minimum
of 8GB of RAM, the VM1 machine having extra storage space, and all
with a good processors (well above the recommended listed in
Michael’s book) and GB Ethernet. Virtual Machines would have
slightly less power, but the Roles are slightly less power hungry
anyway. In this instance, Remote Workers would be connected via
VPN to our internal network, so Remote Worker traffic would act
just like ‘inside user’ traffic.
*Does the above seem like a plausible solution?*
As a secondary necessity – in regards to load testing – what tools
of those available (like WinSIP) would any of you recommend?
Peter Talbot
[v1.0.07.109]_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org <mailto:sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
List Archive:
http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org <mailto:sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
--
======================
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
<mailto:tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net>
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net <mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net>
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net
<mailto:helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net>
Fax: 434.984.8427
Helpdesk Contract Customers:
http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas?
Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
