Without comparing throughput with actual physical machine then the
answer is a big yes.
On Thursday, 23 September, 2010 11:17 PM, Paul Scheepens wrote:
Hi Joegen,
Just so that I (and the rest) understand it correctly:
Do you mean that VMWare only gives problems if audio needs to be
encoded (generated)/recoded(processed)?
And as the SBC is only relaying the RTP stream it does not matter that
the timers are not OK.
Paul
Joegen Baclor <jbac...@ezuce.com> wrote:
>
> sipXBridge will not be an issue with VM. The only issue with VM and
> Media Servers like Freeswitch in your case is the accuracy of the
> timers used in a VM which will be directly have an affect on audio
> sampling. The media anchor is sipXrelay. It does not process nor
> generate any media and, thus, will not require multi-media timer
> accuracy to perform its function. Hope that clears things up a bit.
>
> Joegen
>
>
> On Thursday, 23 September, 2010 04:12 PM, Mark Theis wrote:
> This is my point. I am looking for the answer. For some reason it
> feels like people make comments that do not actually inform me of
> anything. SipXbridge is not helping me. But... What would be the
> best alternative?
>
> Can someone please give the rest of us some pointers? I know that I
> have read all the wiki and I am still lost. Failover and redundancy
> is driving me crazy. Does redundant gateways (sip trunks) work?
>
> The wiki has just enough info to nake ne hungry. Any alternative links?
>
> Sorry to rant. Getting very fryustrated.
>
> -Mark
> Mark D. Theis
>
> Southern California Telephone & Energy
> 27515 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula Ca. 92590
>
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org <sipx-users-
> boun...@list.sipfoundry.org>
> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software <sipx-
> us...@list.sipfoundry.org>
> Cc: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org <sipx-users-
> boun...@list.sipfoundry.org>
> Sent: Thu Sep 23 00:48:16 2010
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SIP Server Questions (Virtual vs Physical)
> R-r-r-r-right, sipxbridge is a-a-a-a-nchoring the m-m-m--media...
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Paul Scheepens <pscheep...@epo.org>
wrote:
> Just a question on the SBC's, as they are handling voice as well,
> wouldn't there be a (possible) issue with VM.
> TeTeTeTalking with the outside world should be PePePePerfect IMHoHO.
>
> Paul
>
>
> From:
>
> Mark Theis <mth...@socaltelephone.com>
>
> To:
>
> Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
<sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
>
> Date:
>
> 23-09-2010 06:40
>
> Subject:
>
> Re: [sipx-users] SIP Server Questions (Virtual vs Physical)
>
> Sent by:
>
> sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
>
>
>
>
>
> Peter,
>
> I like your plan. I am not an expert (maybe because I have only
> been working with this for a month or so) yet, but…. What were you
> thinking to use as your SBC1 and SBC2? Each of your other devices’
> names hinted at (or explicitly said) sipXecs… but the SBC has me
> wondering. Are you thinking to have 2 separate ITSP Gateway (SBC)
> sipXecs VM’s?
>
> As you might have noticed from my last post a couple minutes ago, I
> want to do something very similar to yours… but… all of my users
> will be external. And… I have my servers geo-diverse. This may be a
> problem for me, but I could not find another solution aside from
> sipXecs that claimed the ability to solve my problems.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Mark Theis
>
> Southern California Telephone and Energy
>
> Office (951) 693-1880 Ext. 212
> Fax (951) 693-1550
> Cell (951) 545-1013 or (949) 682-VOIP
>
> 27515 Enterprise Circle West
> Temecula, CA. 92590
> mth...@socaltelephone.com
>
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-
> boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Talbot, Peter
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:43 PM
> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> Subject: [sipx-users] SIP Server Questions (Virtual vs Physical)
>
> Hi all.
>
> In further pursuing a ‘Production Rollout’ ready implementation of
> sipXecs, I had some final questions, mostly in regards to what can
> and cannot be Virtualized. Currently it is looking like anything
> that actually handles voice traffic (whether recorded messages or
> ongoing conversations) should remain physical due to timing
> constraints, but other Roles can be Virtualized.
>
> What I am loosely looking at then, in a server layout fashion, would
> be something along the lines of:
>
> SIPX1 – Physical Server (Internal network) - Management/Primary SIP
Router
> SIPX2 – Physical Server (Internal Network) - Redundant SIP Router
> SBC1 – Virtual Server (DMZ) - Primary ITSP Gateway (SBC)
> SBC2 – Virtual Server (DMZ) - Redundant ITSP Gateway (SBC)
> SIPCN1 – Physical Server (Internal Network) - Conferencing
> SIPWM1 – Physical Server (Internal Network) - Voicemail
> SIPX3 – Virtual Server (Internal Network) - ACD/Instant Messaging
>
> Physical and Virtual Servers would all be 64bit, running a minimum
> of 8GB of RAM, the VM1 machine having extra storage space, and all
> with a good processors (well above the recommended listed in
> Michael’s book) and GB Ethernet. Virtual Machines would have
> slightly less power, but the Roles are slightly less power hungry
> anyway. In this instance, Remote Workers would be connected via VPN
> to our internal network, so Remote Worker traffic would act just
> like ‘inside user’ traffic.
>
> Does the above seem like a plausible solution?
>
> As a secondary necessity – in regards to load testing – what tools
> of those available (like WinSIP) would any of you recommend?
>
> Peter Talbot
> [v1.0.07.109]_______________________________________________
>
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive:
> http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
>
>
> --
> ======================
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
> Fax: 434.984.8431
>
> Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net
> Fax: 434.984.8427
>
> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>
> Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas?
> Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
