Carlo Wood wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:46:50PM -0600, Argent Stonecutter wrote: > >> On 2009-12-22, at 07:44, Dzonatas Sol wrote: >> >>> If someone is not interested in land ownership, why should land limits >>> affect the avatar? >>> >> They won't. Babbage has said that each avatar will have a script quota >> independent of the land it's on. >> > > Yes, and that is what we don't want. > It makes no sense to reserve memory of EVERY private sim, paid > for by their respective owners, for heavy avatars that are normally > not there. If this is how it's going to be then those avatars > should pay for the sim, and the prices for the sim owners should > go down. >
Right now avatar features are locked to a sim, but that doesn't mean avatars should suffer in the long run when they really don't have to be locked to a sim. Right now, reserve memory is needed. In the long run, there should be no extra memory needed for avatars on the physics simulator for avatar features. Right now, script quota is a solution in the short-term. In the long term it is not a solution to artificially lock avatars to sims and have them submiss to sim owners. =/ At this point, region domains and agent domains make way more sense. By then, script quotas won't be needed unless deemed as premium membership to an agent domain. Much the way you feel as a sim owner is the same as people feel as an avatar owner. _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
