> On Thu, 5 May 2011 22:37:14 +0200 (CEST) > [email protected] wrote: > >> > Then, I learn that "we" (?) are debugging tazwok since months & it >> > still hardly buggy... So, as usual I reply that the tool is quite >> stable >> > now, and if you are aware of bugs you can eventually inform me about, >> & >> > post something at http://bugs.slitaz.org/ >> >> Can you take a look at http://bugs.slitaz.org/issue28 ? >> Before your commit http://hg.slitaz.org/tazpkg/rev/5f9f0aceea96 >> Say with http://hg.slitaz.org/tazpkg/raw-file/005867d1ffdd/tazpkg >> # tazlito get-flavor core; yes '' | tazlito gen-distro >> was building working isos >> > > > Not sure that you noticed I was talking about tazwok, not tazpkg⦠> Not sure that you noticed that I was talking about directs accusations > used instead of clever argumentation in this team⦠> > Anyway⦠> > This is code to translate querries (y/n » o/n etc). > > Here's the code: > translate_querry() > { > case $1 in > y) gettext "y" ;; > Y) gettext "Y" ;; > n) gettext "n" ;; > N) gettext "N" ;; > > # Support other cases but keep them untranslated. > *) echo "$1" ;; > > esac > } > > e.g. translate_querry y returns the equivalent letter in the current > language. > > There's a simple solution: put the same code into tazlito & generate a > po to traduce y by o. Or a stupid one: rollback because you don't want > to translate querry.
Not sure that you noticed http://bugs.slitaz.org/msg72 in http://bugs.slitaz.org/issue28 --- SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
