Pankso your doing it again. Your depending on slitaz-toolchain and
slitaz-dev-pkgs. slitaz-toolchain i understand but slitaz-dev-pkgs is like
everything. Please look at the tazwok.conf SLITAZ_TOOLCHAIN to know what is
need and what is not.

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Christopher Rogers
<[email protected]>wrote:

> I starting to add compatibility into tazwok in case of cookutils repos.
>
> http://hg.slitaz.org/tazwok/rev/7766fc7a2d10
>
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Christophe Lincoln <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>> > You threating to use cookutils will reverse everything my and
>> > GoKhlaYeh have done. It cause me to not sleep for last day.
>>
>> Christopher, do you think I sleep well ? We are, and most people here
>> I guess, passionate people, we love what we do, maybe a bit too much
>> some time. Christian is correct we want to work for pleasure, in a
>> happyness ambiance and together.
>>
>> > GoKhlaYeh made the new tazwok. I just helped supervised fixes. He
>> > sald it was better to put his changes into tazwok since tazbb was too
>> > far gone. It was also to reduce lines of code i think.
>>
>> Yes and now we can't work together on Tazwok since it is too
>> complicated. Look to commits, a part you and Go, no one is able to help
>> and this is a problem.
>>
>> What I found fancy is that YOU said yourself "give me access to
>> cookutils repo so I can help making it as powerfull as Tazwok but
>> without the bloat". You implicitly says that Tazwok is bloated!!!
>>
>> Now I said no to repo acces because it's too much for me at the moment
>> and in the current conditions, but I said you can send patch (most
>> open-source project work like that, ther is a maitainer who mamage
>> submited patch before inclusion).
>>
>> > We also have libtaz for adding common functions and
>> > @Eric Joseph-Alexandre
>> >
>> > Tank can't be some magic box where the packages can be build but
>> > never debug but on tank. Thats where the problems started. Thats what
>> > the new tazwok was trying to fix.
>>
>> Yes and we (tank maintainers) was aware of that much before you started
>> work on tazwok. You say "the new tazwok was trying to fix" and it
>> fails. The cookutils have build deps in mind from the start and will
>> solve this problem.
>>
>> - Christophe
>>
>> ---
>> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to