Hi Arun, I am not really the person you can ask this question, because I had already troubles to get wok working. This has to be answered by somebody else. Hopfully I get a proper wok using your guide.
And I think, we have to look, if these errors also appear on a fresh wok You asked somewhere, who is managing docs - we all are managing it - just create an account and you can change the guides.... Thomas On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:43:02 +0530 Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > I have queries regarding 2 issues I faced during compilation: > > 1. I had to remove a particular diff from the 3.2.50 patch file as it > was already applied. > 2. I had to include the following header in > wok/linux/src/linux-3.2.50/drivers/net/ifb.c - > #include <linux/sched.h> > > How to you go about handling these kind of issues in the SliTaz dev > environment? If not handled these will come when someone compiles the > packages for 3.2.50. > > > Regards, > > Arun > > http://regexp.co.nr > > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 9:42 PM, tom <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Arun, > > > > so far it looks good, already running on my Portege - I will do an > > iso and then we can check if we need any changes... > > > > Thomas > > > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 02:19:58 +0530 > > Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > You can downalod the new set of packages from here: > > > https://app.box.com/s/zkewp5z2x1idlorstpsr > > > > > > Please check the config and let me know if I need to change > > > anything there. > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Arun > > > > > > http://regexp.co.nr > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Arun Prakash Jana > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > Possibly because I enabled PAE in the config options. As I > > > > mentioned above, I am going through the config options again. > > > > Have patience. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Arun > > > > > > > > http://regexp.co.nr > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:40 PM, tom <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi Arun, > > > >> > > > >> you compiled a PAE Kernel - please dont do it - I will not be > > > >> able to make a testing iso, becaus e my Portege R100 does not > > > >> support PAE > > > >> > > > >> and also for testing the IDE devices its useless, because most > > > >> of the IDE computeres dont support PAE > > > >> > > > >> Thomas > > > >> > > > >> Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:39:38 +0530 > > > >> Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > I am revisiting the config options by comparing with those > > > >> > from the Porteus config file... so please discard the above > > > >> > package. I will upload the new set of packages in 1 or 2 > > > >> > days. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Regards, > > > >> > > > > >> > Arun > > > >> > > > > >> > http://regexp.co.nr > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Arun Prakash Jana > > > >> > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Hi Tom, > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Copying my mail from the kernel discussion thread: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Here goes the package for 3.2.50 I have compiled: > > > >> > > https://app.box.com/s/jo2jeiqq86vypub3b8d7 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > It has the modified config, log, packages and the modified > > > >> > > patch in it. Check it out. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Regards, > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Arun > > > >> > > > > > >> > > http://regexp.co.nr > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Arun Prakash Jana < > > > >> > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> Hi Tom, > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> I too had to use a different system from last Friday to > > > >> > >> get it done :). There had been many new config additions > > > >> > >> but the good news is that the config changes are done now! > > > >> > >> Post compilation I am hitting an issue with receipt files. > > > >> > >> Will work on that and upload everything once it's fixed. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Regards, > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Arun > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:57 AM, tom <[email protected]> > > > >> > >> wrote: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >>> Hi Arun, > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> I dont know one - but it was for me the same to get the > > > >> > >>> new IDE config for 3.2.40 - it took something like one > > > >> > >>> week until it compiled fine. > > > >> > >>> It was running it on my sound and video cutting machine > > > >> > >>> and I just went there, when I had time.... > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> Thomas > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:44:00 +0530 > > > >> > >>> Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > I am using 3.2.50 along with the config file for IDE > > > >> > >>> > fix. However it's taking a long time as there are many > > > >> > >>> > new config changes. And in case of every missing > > > >> > >>> > config the build is restarting rom the beginning. Is > > > >> > >>> > there any tweak to continue from compile failure for > > > >> > >>> > the linux package instead of building from the > > > >> > >>> > beginning or at least skip the already built modules? > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > Regards, > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > Arun > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:36 PM, tom <[email protected]> > > > >> > >>> > wrote: > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > Hi Arun, > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > 3.2.50 is available > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > Thomas > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > Am Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:44:05 +0530 > > > >> > >>> > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]>: > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > Hi Tom, > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > OK, I got what you mean. > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > Regards, > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > Arun > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:23 PM, tom > > > >> > >>> > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > Hi Arun, > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > I know, that there is a LTS 3.4.xx Kernel - I > > > >> > >>> > > > > mean you can try whatever you want, but I think, > > > >> > >>> > > > > it will not go into SliTaz 5.0. > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > Just an experience from 3.0 - there was a change > > > >> > >>> > > > > from 2.6.36 to 2.6.37 ?? and it made a lot of > > > >> > >>> > > > > troubles - no more 486 support only 686 - there > > > >> > >>> > > > > is a long thread about it. > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > But this has to be answered by somebody else... > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > Thomas > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > Am Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:33:09 +0530 > > > >> > >>> > > > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana > > > >> > >>> > > > > <[email protected]>: > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > A new LTS is available: > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-4-54-LTS-Officially-Released-370824.shtml > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > Can we try this one? > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > Regards, > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > Arun > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:58 PM, tom > > > >> > >>> > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > Hi Arun and Kapil, > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > As Kernel 3.2. is a Longterm Kernel, in my > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > oppinion for the stability of wok its better > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > to stay with it - so we are at the moment on > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > 3.2.48, so when you try a new kernel, try it > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > with this one. > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-2-48-LTS-Officially-Released-with-UEFI-Anti-bricking-Code-364558.shtml > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > When I compiled in spring, linux compiled > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > well, but I did not get all the other linux > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > packages linke linux-wireless, linux-agp, > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > linux-dialup > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > if you they compile on your system, it would > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > be cool to put them online, so I can do an > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > iso and test with my ide devices... > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > Thomas > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > Am Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:27:42 +0530 > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > schrieb kapil jain <[email protected]>: > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > I have had the similar results as Arun. > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > I second the thought of newer version of > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > kernel if we are anyway doing a kernel > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > update from 2.6 to 3.2, why not make it a > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > higher version. > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Arun > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > Prakash Jana <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Here's an update - I am past the initial > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > hiccups with setup and last night I left > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > the default things to build as they are. > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > I can see that the package > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > linux-3.2.40.tazpkg I created. I will > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > try with Tom's patch tonight again. > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Kapil was also trying the same last > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > night. So I guess he will also update > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > the same results. > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > A thought here - as the mainline kernel > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > is around 3.11. Once the patch works > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > fine for 3.2.40, I am thinking of moving > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > to the latest version with everything. > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > What do you guys say? > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Arun > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, tom > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> Hi Arun, > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> can you please see the kernel thread.... > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/kernel-config-discussion > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> for older PCs with IDE drives it is the > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> main blocker > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> Thomas > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> Am Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:53:20 +0530 > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> schrieb Arun Prakash Jana > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> <[email protected]>: > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Hi, > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > I started the following thread a month > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > back regarding Slitaz 5.0: > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/release-date-for-slitaz-50 > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > I have got some time now and would > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > like to contribute to the release of > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > version 5.0. Can someone please list > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > down the current blockers for version > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > 5.0 release? > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Regards, > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Arun > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> -- > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> http://www.slitaz.org/ > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > -- > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > http://www.slitaz.org/ > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > -- > > > >> > >>> > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - > > > >> > >>> > > > > http://www.slitaz.org/ > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > -- > > > >> > >>> > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - > > > >> > >>> > > http://www.slitaz.org/ > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> -- > > > >> > >>> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ > > > > -- SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
