I am revisiting the config options by comparing with those from the Porteus config file... so please discard the above package. I will upload the new set of packages in 1 or 2 days.
Regards, Arun http://regexp.co.nr On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Copying my mail from the kernel discussion thread: > > Here goes the package for 3.2.50 I have compiled: > https://app.box.com/s/jo2jeiqq86vypub3b8d7 > > It has the modified config, log, packages and the modified patch in it. > Check it out. > > > Regards, > > Arun > > http://regexp.co.nr > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Arun Prakash Jana < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Tom, >> >> I too had to use a different system from last Friday to get it done :). >> There had been many new config additions but the good news is that the >> config changes are done now! >> Post compilation I am hitting an issue with receipt files. Will work on >> that and upload everything once it's fixed. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Arun >> >> http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:57 AM, tom <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Arun, >>> >>> I dont know one - but it was for me the same to get the new IDE >>> config for 3.2.40 - it took something like one week until it compiled >>> fine. >>> It was running it on my sound and video cutting machine and I just went >>> there, when I had time.... >>> >>> Thomas >>> >>> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:44:00 +0530 >>> Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > I am using 3.2.50 along with the config file for IDE fix. However it's >>> > taking a long time as there are many new config changes. And in case >>> > of every missing config the build is restarting rom the beginning. Is >>> > there any tweak to continue from compile failure for the linux >>> > package instead of building from the beginning or at least skip the >>> > already built modules? >>> > >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > >>> > Arun >>> > >>> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:36 PM, tom <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi Arun, >>> > > >>> > > 3.2.50 is available >>> > > >>> > > Thomas >>> > > >>> > > Am Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:44:05 +0530 >>> > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]>: >>> > > >>> > > > Hi Tom, >>> > > > >>> > > > OK, I got what you mean. >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > Regards, >>> > > > >>> > > > Arun >>> > > > >>> > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:23 PM, tom <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > > Hi Arun, >>> > > > > >>> > > > > I know, that there is a LTS 3.4.xx Kernel - I mean you can try >>> > > > > whatever you want, but I think, it will not go into SliTaz 5.0. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Just an experience from 3.0 - there was a change from 2.6.36 to >>> > > > > 2.6.37 ?? and it made a lot of troubles - no more 486 support >>> > > > > only 686 - there is a long thread about it. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > But this has to be answered by somebody else... >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Thomas >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Am Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:33:09 +0530 >>> > > > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]>: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > Hi Tom, >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > A new LTS is available: >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-4-54-LTS-Officially-Released-370824.shtml >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Can we try this one? >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Regards, >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Arun >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:58 PM, tom <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Hi Arun and Kapil, >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > As Kernel 3.2. is a Longterm Kernel, in my oppinion for the >>> > > > > > > stability of wok its better to stay with it - so we are at >>> > > > > > > the moment on 3.2.48, so when you try a new kernel, try it >>> > > > > > > with this one. >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-2-48-LTS-Officially-Released-with-UEFI-Anti-bricking-Code-364558.shtml >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > When I compiled in spring, linux compiled well, but I did >>> > > > > > > not get all the other linux packages linke linux-wireless, >>> > > > > > > linux-agp, linux-dialup >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > if you they compile on your system, it would be cool to put >>> > > > > > > them online, so I can do an iso and test with my ide >>> > > > > > > devices... >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Thomas >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Am Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:27:42 +0530 >>> > > > > > > schrieb kapil jain <[email protected]>: >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > I have had the similar results as Arun. >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > I second the thought of newer version of kernel if we are >>> > > > > > > > anyway doing a kernel update from 2.6 to 3.2, why not make >>> > > > > > > > it a higher version. >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Arun Prakash Jana >>> > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Hi Guys, >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Here's an update - I am past the initial hiccups with >>> > > > > > > > > setup and last night I left the default things to build >>> > > > > > > > > as they are. I can see that the package >>> > > > > > > > > linux-3.2.40.tazpkg I created. I will try with Tom's >>> > > > > > > > > patch tonight again. >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Kapil was also trying the same last night. So I guess he >>> > > > > > > > > will also update the same results. >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > A thought here - as the mainline kernel is around 3.11. >>> > > > > > > > > Once the patch works fine for 3.2.40, I am thinking of >>> > > > > > > > > moving to the latest version with everything. What do >>> > > > > > > > > you guys say? >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Regards, >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Arun >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, tom <[email protected]> >>> > > > > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> Hi Arun, >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> can you please see the kernel thread.... >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/kernel-config-discussion >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> for older PCs with IDE drives it is the main blocker >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> Thomas >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> Am Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:53:20 +0530 >>> > > > > > > > >> schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]>: >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> > Hi, >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > I started the following thread a month back regarding >>> > > > > > > > >> > Slitaz 5.0: >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/release-date-for-slitaz-50 >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > I have got some time now and would like to >>> > > > > > > > >> > contribute to the release of version 5.0. >>> > > > > > > > >> > Can someone please list down the current blockers for >>> > > > > > > > >> > version 5.0 release? >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Regards, >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Arun >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> -- >>> > > > > > > > >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > -- >>> > > > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > -- >>> > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ >>> > > >>> > > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ >>> >>> >> >
