Possibly because I enabled PAE in the config options. As I mentioned above, I am going through the config options again. Have patience.
Regards, Arun http://regexp.co.nr On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:40 PM, tom <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Arun, > > you compiled a PAE Kernel - please dont do it - I will not be able to > make a testing iso, becaus e my Portege R100 does not support PAE > > and also for testing the IDE devices its useless, because most of the > IDE computeres dont support PAE > > Thomas > > Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:39:38 +0530 > Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I am revisiting the config options by comparing with those from the > > Porteus config file... so please discard the above package. I will > > upload the new set of packages in 1 or 2 days. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Arun > > > > http://regexp.co.nr > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Arun Prakash Jana > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > Copying my mail from the kernel discussion thread: > > > > > > Here goes the package for 3.2.50 I have compiled: > > > https://app.box.com/s/jo2jeiqq86vypub3b8d7 > > > > > > It has the modified config, log, packages and the modified patch in > > > it. Check it out. > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Arun > > > > > > http://regexp.co.nr > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Arun Prakash Jana < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Tom, > > >> > > >> I too had to use a different system from last Friday to get it > > >> done :). There had been many new config additions but the good > > >> news is that the config changes are done now! > > >> Post compilation I am hitting an issue with receipt files. Will > > >> work on that and upload everything once it's fixed. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> Arun > > >> > > >> http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:57 AM, tom <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi Arun, > > >>> > > >>> I dont know one - but it was for me the same to get the new IDE > > >>> config for 3.2.40 - it took something like one week until it > > >>> compiled fine. > > >>> It was running it on my sound and video cutting machine and I > > >>> just went there, when I had time.... > > >>> > > >>> Thomas > > >>> > > >>> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:44:00 +0530 > > >>> Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > I am using 3.2.50 along with the config file for IDE fix. > > >>> > However it's taking a long time as there are many new config > > >>> > changes. And in case of every missing config the build is > > >>> > restarting rom the beginning. Is there any tweak to continue > > >>> > from compile failure for the linux package instead of building > > >>> > from the beginning or at least skip the already built modules? > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > Regards, > > >>> > > > >>> > Arun > > >>> > > > >>> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:36 PM, tom <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > > Hi Arun, > > >>> > > > > >>> > > 3.2.50 is available > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Thomas > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Am Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:44:05 +0530 > > >>> > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]>: > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Hi Tom, > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > OK, I got what you mean. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Regards, > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Arun > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:23 PM, tom <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > Hi Arun, > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > I know, that there is a LTS 3.4.xx Kernel - I mean you > > >>> > > > > can try whatever you want, but I think, it will not go > > >>> > > > > into SliTaz 5.0. > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > Just an experience from 3.0 - there was a change from > > >>> > > > > 2.6.36 to 2.6.37 ?? and it made a lot of troubles - no > > >>> > > > > more 486 support only 686 - there is a long thread about > > >>> > > > > it. > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > But this has to be answered by somebody else... > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > Thomas > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > Am Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:33:09 +0530 > > >>> > > > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]>: > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Hi Tom, > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > A new LTS is available: > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-4-54-LTS-Officially-Released-370824.shtml > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Can we try this one? > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Regards, > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Arun > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:58 PM, tom <[email protected]> > > >>> > > > > > wrote: > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Hi Arun and Kapil, > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > As Kernel 3.2. is a Longterm Kernel, in my oppinion > > >>> > > > > > > for the stability of wok its better to stay with it - > > >>> > > > > > > so we are at the moment on 3.2.48, so when you try a > > >>> > > > > > > new kernel, try it with this one. > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-2-48-LTS-Officially-Released-with-UEFI-Anti-bricking-Code-364558.shtml > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > When I compiled in spring, linux compiled well, but I > > >>> > > > > > > did not get all the other linux packages linke > > >>> > > > > > > linux-wireless, linux-agp, linux-dialup > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > if you they compile on your system, it would be cool > > >>> > > > > > > to put them online, so I can do an iso and test with > > >>> > > > > > > my ide devices... > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Thomas > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Am Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:27:42 +0530 > > >>> > > > > > > schrieb kapil jain <[email protected]>: > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > I have had the similar results as Arun. > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > I second the thought of newer version of kernel if > > >>> > > > > > > > we are anyway doing a kernel update from 2.6 to > > >>> > > > > > > > 3.2, why not make it a higher version. > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Arun Prakash Jana > > >>> > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Hi Guys, > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Here's an update - I am past the initial hiccups > > >>> > > > > > > > > with setup and last night I left the default > > >>> > > > > > > > > things to build as they are. I can see that the > > >>> > > > > > > > > package linux-3.2.40.tazpkg I created. I will try > > >>> > > > > > > > > with Tom's patch tonight again. > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Kapil was also trying the same last night. So I > > >>> > > > > > > > > guess he will also update the same results. > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > A thought here - as the mainline kernel is around > > >>> > > > > > > > > 3.11. Once the patch works fine for 3.2.40, I am > > >>> > > > > > > > > thinking of moving to the latest version with > > >>> > > > > > > > > everything. What do you guys say? > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Regards, > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Arun > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, tom > > >>> > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> Hi Arun, > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> can you please see the kernel thread.... > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/kernel-config-discussion > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> for older PCs with IDE drives it is the main > > >>> > > > > > > > >> blocker > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> Thomas > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> Am Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:53:20 +0530 > > >>> > > > > > > > >> schrieb Arun Prakash Jana > > >>> > > > > > > > >> <[email protected]>: > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Hi, > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > I started the following thread a month back > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > regarding Slitaz 5.0: > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/release-date-for-slitaz-50 > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > I have got some time now and would like to > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > contribute to the release of version 5.0. > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Can someone please list down the current > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > blockers for version 5.0 release? > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Regards, > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Arun > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> -- > > >>> > > > > > > > >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - > > >>> > > > > > > > >> http://www.slitaz.org/ > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > -- > > >>> > > > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > -- > > >>> > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > -- > > >>> > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > -- > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ > >
