Hi Arun, so far it looks good, already running on my Portege - I will do an iso and then we can check if we need any changes...
Thomas On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 02:19:58 +0530 Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > You can downalod the new set of packages from here: > https://app.box.com/s/zkewp5z2x1idlorstpsr > > Please check the config and let me know if I need to change anything > there. > > > Regards, > > Arun > > http://regexp.co.nr > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Arun Prakash Jana > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Possibly because I enabled PAE in the config options. As I mentioned > > above, I am going through the config options again. Have patience. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Arun > > > > http://regexp.co.nr > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:40 PM, tom <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Arun, > >> > >> you compiled a PAE Kernel - please dont do it - I will not be able > >> to make a testing iso, becaus e my Portege R100 does not support > >> PAE > >> > >> and also for testing the IDE devices its useless, because most of > >> the IDE computeres dont support PAE > >> > >> Thomas > >> > >> Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:39:38 +0530 > >> Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > I am revisiting the config options by comparing with those from > >> > the Porteus config file... so please discard the above package. > >> > I will upload the new set of packages in 1 or 2 days. > >> > > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > > >> > Arun > >> > > >> > http://regexp.co.nr > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Arun Prakash Jana > >> > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi Tom, > >> > > > >> > > Copying my mail from the kernel discussion thread: > >> > > > >> > > Here goes the package for 3.2.50 I have compiled: > >> > > https://app.box.com/s/jo2jeiqq86vypub3b8d7 > >> > > > >> > > It has the modified config, log, packages and the modified > >> > > patch in it. Check it out. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Regards, > >> > > > >> > > Arun > >> > > > >> > > http://regexp.co.nr > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Arun Prakash Jana < > >> > > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Hi Tom, > >> > >> > >> > >> I too had to use a different system from last Friday to get it > >> > >> done :). There had been many new config additions but the good > >> > >> news is that the config changes are done now! > >> > >> Post compilation I am hitting an issue with receipt files. > >> > >> Will work on that and upload everything once it's fixed. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> > >> > >> Arun > >> > >> > >> > >> http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:57 AM, tom <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> Hi Arun, > >> > >>> > >> > >>> I dont know one - but it was for me the same to get the new > >> > >>> IDE config for 3.2.40 - it took something like one week > >> > >>> until it compiled fine. > >> > >>> It was running it on my sound and video cutting machine and I > >> > >>> just went there, when I had time.... > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Thomas > >> > >>> > >> > >>> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:44:00 +0530 > >> > >>> Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > I am using 3.2.50 along with the config file for IDE fix. > >> > >>> > However it's taking a long time as there are many new > >> > >>> > config changes. And in case of every missing config the > >> > >>> > build is restarting rom the beginning. Is there any tweak > >> > >>> > to continue from compile failure for the linux package > >> > >>> > instead of building from the beginning or at least skip > >> > >>> > the already built modules? > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > Regards, > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > Arun > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:36 PM, tom <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > Hi Arun, > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > 3.2.50 is available > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > Thomas > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > Am Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:44:05 +0530 > >> > >>> > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]>: > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Hi Tom, > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > OK, I got what you mean. > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > Regards, > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > Arun > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:23 PM, tom <[email protected]> > >> > >>> > > > wrote: > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > Hi Arun, > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > I know, that there is a LTS 3.4.xx Kernel - I mean > >> > >>> > > > > you can try whatever you want, but I think, it will > >> > >>> > > > > not go into SliTaz 5.0. > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > Just an experience from 3.0 - there was a change from > >> > >>> > > > > 2.6.36 to 2.6.37 ?? and it made a lot of troubles - > >> > >>> > > > > no more 486 support only 686 - there is a long > >> > >>> > > > > thread about it. > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > But this has to be answered by somebody else... > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > Thomas > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > Am Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:33:09 +0530 > >> > >>> > > > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]>: > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > Hi Tom, > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > A new LTS is available: > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > >> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-4-54-LTS-Officially-Released-370824.shtml > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > Can we try this one? > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > Regards, > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > Arun > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:58 PM, tom > >> > >>> > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > Hi Arun and Kapil, > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > As Kernel 3.2. is a Longterm Kernel, in my > >> > >>> > > > > > > oppinion for the stability of wok its better to > >> > >>> > > > > > > stay with it - so we are at the moment on > >> > >>> > > > > > > 3.2.48, so when you try a new kernel, try it > >> > >>> > > > > > > with this one. > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > >> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-2-48-LTS-Officially-Released-with-UEFI-Anti-bricking-Code-364558.shtml > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > When I compiled in spring, linux compiled well, > >> > >>> > > > > > > but I did not get all the other linux packages > >> > >>> > > > > > > linke linux-wireless, linux-agp, linux-dialup > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > if you they compile on your system, it would be > >> > >>> > > > > > > cool to put them online, so I can do an iso and > >> > >>> > > > > > > test with my ide devices... > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > Thomas > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > Am Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:27:42 +0530 > >> > >>> > > > > > > schrieb kapil jain <[email protected]>: > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > I have had the similar results as Arun. > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > I second the thought of newer version of > >> > >>> > > > > > > > kernel if we are anyway doing a kernel update > >> > >>> > > > > > > > from 2.6 to 3.2, why not make it a higher > >> > >>> > > > > > > > version. > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Arun Prakash > >> > >>> > > > > > > > Jana <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Hi Guys, > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Here's an update - I am past the initial > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > hiccups with setup and last night I left the > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > default things to build as they are. I can > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > see that the package linux-3.2.40.tazpkg I > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > created. I will try with Tom's patch tonight > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > again. > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Kapil was also trying the same last night. > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > So I guess he will also update the same > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > results. > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > A thought here - as the mainline kernel is > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > around 3.11. Once the patch works fine for > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > 3.2.40, I am thinking of moving to the > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > latest version with everything. What do you > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > guys say? > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Regards, > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Arun > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, tom > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> Hi Arun, > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> can you please see the kernel thread.... > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/kernel-config-discussion > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> for older PCs with IDE drives it is the main > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> blocker > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> Thomas > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> Am Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:53:20 +0530 > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> schrieb Arun Prakash Jana > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> <[email protected]>: > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Hi, > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > I started the following thread a month > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > back regarding Slitaz 5.0: > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >>> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/release-date-for-slitaz-50 > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > I have got some time now and would like to > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > contribute to the release of version 5.0. > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Can someone please list down the current > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > blockers for version 5.0 release? > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Regards, > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Arun > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> -- > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> http://www.slitaz.org/ > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > -- > >> > >>> > > > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - > >> > >>> > > > > > > http://www.slitaz.org/ > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > -- > >> > >>> > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - > >> > >>> > > > > http://www.slitaz.org/ > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > -- > >> > >>> > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> -- > >> > >>> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ > >> > >> > > -- SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
