duhh.... Obi WAn Moonshinie
*grin*
Elvin
-
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Moonshi Mohsenruddin wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Yeaahhh! That was the name! Geeeee... with all these Star Wars gimmick
> and hype I think I am going nuts with names that have a Dark, Dough or
> Doug and Vader, Farber... whatever! hehehehhe...
>
> mYSQL is good.
>
> - --
> Moonshi Mohsenruddin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Singapore icq:2595480 http://www.linux.com.sg
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Alf
> > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 1999 2:35 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [SLP] Search Engine for SLP
> >
> >
> > Hehhe.. i think it's Doug Faber u are talking about.. hahaa...
> >
> > Informix's staff is nicer and generally more approachable. They
> > sponsored
> > their conference room to LUGs once (At Gateway)
> >
> > I still prefer mySQL :)
> >
> > Elvin
> > -
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Moonshi Mohsenruddin wrote:
> >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Elvin,
> > >
> > > Lionel is very correct! Oracle is bulky, slow and resource hungry.
> I
> > > personally prefer Informix as it is fast, web-enabled,
> user-friendly,
> > > uses less system resources and very stable on Linux. My company is
> > > currently using Informix dB on Linux for our MRP/ERP
> > application server
> > > which is on Solaris and the integration with the two of them is
> > > seamless!
> > >
> > > Oracle is a brand name and it is only good for huge applications
> that
> > > needs replication, high availability, fail-overs,
> > multi-gateway and etc
> > > & all these functions in NOT available on Linux yet.
> > >
> > > I have net and spoke to Dough Vader, some Manager from Oracle for
> the
> > > Linux Enterprise Computing Division and he was not so keen to
> discuss
> > > anything about Oracle on Linux.
> > >
> > > I then spoke to Informix and they have always respected me, give
> me a
> > > lot of information, helpful, very informative and supportive. If
> there
> > > are no obligations, I will spoke to Informix about this.
> > >
> > > - --
> > > Moonshi Mohsenruddin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Singapore icq:2595480 http://www.linux.com.sg
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > On Behalf Of Alf
> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 1999 2:02 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: [SLP] Search Engine for SLP
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Could we use mySQL instead for the Database ? Coz I believe
> > Boonhwee's
> > > > interface uses mySQL as the database backend..
> > > >
> > > > Moonshi: I wonder if Oracle wants to sponsor us *wink*
> > > >
> > > > Elvin
> > > > -
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, DoC wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Erm..I can look into it from mid September unless u have the
> thing
> > > > > from Oracle settled. Unless u're using a Oracle database to
> serve
> > > > > up web pages, I don't why u would want to use Oracle. As far
> as I
> > > know,
> > > > > Oracle is a RDBMs and CAN be used to index/serve web
> > pages if u have
> > >
> > > > > one of their fancy plugins. Informix has a similar solution
> but is
> > > web
> > > > > orientated and been in market for sometime.(the place I work
> uses
> > > it).
> > > > >
> > > > > But but....why kill a fly with a ballistic missile? Those
> > things are
> > > a
> > > > > bloody nightmare to install and configure esp Oracle. Stick
> with
> > > Dig,
> > > > > Alkaline(the guy is quite nice and he responds to your email)
> > > > > or one of those other free ones is better. Clean, simple and
> has
> > > > > minimal maintance. IFF, SLP gets a makeover down the road,
> then
> > > > > we change..(informix has everything in a nice package). But
> SLP
> > > currently
> > > > > is static(right?) html, so a simple solution will
> suffice....:) SW
> > > is suppose
> > > > > to solve problems and not create them!!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Lionel
> > > > >
> > > > > PS : oops...somehow a private mail got onto the list. Blame
> > > > > it on my Outlook Express...;)
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Use the GNU search engine source found at
> http://www.htdig.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can Lionel look into the implementation of the search
> engine?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Chin Qui, you told me something about Oracle sponsoring us a
> > > > > > search engine?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - --
> > > > > > > Moonshi Mohsenruddin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Singapore icq:2595480 http://www.linux.com.sg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > > > > > DoC
> > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 1999 3:50 AM
> > > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [SLP] the picture is clearer from SLP's
> > > perspective
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > know anything abt spiders/search engines? The cnet web
> > > > > > > > programming section
> > > > > > > > has a good general introduction section on it. What
> > do u want
> > > > > > > > to know? Leech
> > > > > > > > stuff from sites and then display on yours?..:)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Lionel
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >PS : Raymond, I forgot to tell u that I have
> experience
> > > > > > > > implementing a
> > > > > > > > beta
> > > > > > > > > Altavista SDK. Do u want a search engine for >SLP(not
> > > > > > > > altavista though
> > > > > > > > > becoz license prob but there are a bunch of others)?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hey lionel. I am very interested in spiders and search
> > > engine.
> > > > > > > mail
> > > > > > > > > privately.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > > > > > Version: PGPfreeware 6.0.2i
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > iQA/AwUBN8xe2Wefe0TVuy5lEQIXgQCgyLuWi4ffky9RDxDtb9kOJ+R+sAkAoPcP
> > > > > > > LQGOFzETzX+fDheztmWpIeO4
> > > > > > > =Ibln
> > > > > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > Version: PGPfreeware 6.0.2i
> > >
> > > iQA/AwUBN82nMmefe0TVuy5lEQIyTQCgq95li4Sw+Q8WsuaKhYfkdeXk8d4AnRdB
> > > 4XHiXthmDtbqYo1OF7GEMM/T
> > > =lDXQ
> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >
> > >
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGPfreeware 6.0.2i
>
> iQA/AwUBN83Bymefe0TVuy5lEQINOgCgqjA0bom/IuhcHJsgFnPY3j4HfjMAn3aX
> 6idVsV10AZmp/t0tNJXjuxmL
> =aDk5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
