Price is not really the question. Because even though initial cost can be
higher for a better product. It can pay back by not having to fork out money
at every power failure (at the moment 3 times a week!!!) in the form of
support charges by a technician contractor to fix up all the problems
potentially arising from the power failure and loss of several hours of
productivity by the users. Considering even a largish investment can be
worth while.
What I wanted to know is, if you (anybody) had any good or bad experiences
one way or another with one or the other brand or model and of course: Do
they work with: RH6.0, NT4SP5 and SCO 5.????
Anyhow. Thanks for your input.
Bernhard
-----Original Message-----
From: DaZZa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 March 2000 14:53
To: Bernhard L�der
Cc: SLUG user group (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [SLUG] OT: UPS recommendations required
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, [iso-8859-1] Bernhard L�der wrote:
> I wonder, if anybody has any recommendations for UPS.
>
> I have 3 servers to secure. RH6.0, NT4SP5 and SCO 5.????.
>
> We want them to work for 15 to 30 minutes after a power failure and
shutdown
> by themselfes when battery power fails.
How much money do you want to spend?
APC's can't be beaten, IMHO. They're the bee's knees of UPS's.
Not cheap, though.
DaZZa
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text
