Has anyone mentioned the TPA - "abuse of market power", or even "dumping"?

Howard.
______________________________________________________
LANNet Computing Associates <http://www.lannet.com.au>

On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Rachel Polanskis wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Simon Bryan wrote:
> 
> > Let me give you some figures:
> > MSOfficePro license $95
> > NTWS4.0 license $45
> > NTServer $150 - unlimited licenses as you license the Workstations
> > 
> > These are not big figures, they are cheap. I have seen Linux selling in shops 
> > for more than this.
> 
> I have seen these figures too. 
> They are very anticompetitive.   No other "commercial" OS or software vendor 
> could afford to bundle an offer like this together.
> 
> Bill knows this so he is assured of making the schools" an offer they can't
> refuse" and then has them "locked in".  When the time comes 
> for the next round of product upgrades the schools have no choice 
> but to concede and slip Bill a little more blood money.  The same thing 
> has happened here at UWS, with inappropriate MS licensing and 
> bundling being put up as the standard for desktop systems now. 
> Other vendors just can't compete and as such don't get a look in.
> Hell - you can't even suggest them!   
> 
> Sorry - this is off topic from my original commentary but it ires me to 
> see these figures touted as "a good thing" - it's not.  It stifles innovation
> and while the schools seem to be getting a "good deal" it's not a good 
> deal for the rest of the end user community.  That's why I am always 
> at pains to suggest or implement a UNIX or at least Linux solution
> when I am asked to do these things.  

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text

Reply via email to