Jon Biddell wrote:
>
> At 09:26 AM 4/30/00 +1200, Del wrote:
> >Barrie Hall wrote:
> >
> > > Yep, it's in the DOJ final judgement, here:
> > >
> > > http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f4600/4639.htm
> >
> >This has real teeth. Compliance procedure, banning individuals
> >or companies from holding more than 3% stock in both companies,
> >etc.
>
> Caveat: I am NOT a supporter of MicroSloth's business ethics, BUT;
>
> 1. Most of the provisions of this are unenforcable in the real world.
>
> 2. It stifles any future technical creativity, not only for MS but for
> other companies as well.
I saw Bill say this on the teev and I really don't see how the proposal
stifles creativity in companies other than MS.
Erik
--
+-------------------------------------------------+
Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-------------------------------------------------+
Spook bait:
heroin Albright terrify extradite packages uranium
airport terminal Yeltsin code kill blast president
train station Clinton opium nitro money sneak hash
keep secret DEA smuggle FBI get caught execute LSD
assassinate NSA terrorize bombed encrypt plutonium
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text