Graeme Merrall wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 12:28:48PM +1100, Howard Lowndes wrote: > > Try the media. They usually like a good Internet security beatup story. > > > Suggestions anyone? How about the woman who wrote the daming article on a (ficticious) security hole in RH Linux based on A.Toad's crap. Dominique Jackson from memory (The Australian) ... she owes us one ;^) -- Rick Welykochy || Praxis Services Pty Limited "If talk is cheap how do entrepreneurs make money?" -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- [SLUG] Linux doesn't have bad security... Graeme Merrall
- Re: [SLUG] Linux doesn't have bad security... John Ferlito
- Re: [SLUG] Linux doesn't have bad security... tom burkart
- Re: [SLUG] Linux doesn't have bad security... Howard Lowndes
- Re: [SLUG] Linux doesn't have bad security... Graeme Merrall
- Re: [SLUG] Linux doesn't have bad secu... Rick Welykochy
- Re: [SLUG] Linux doesn't have bad... Graeme Merrall
- Re: [SLUG] Linux doesn't have bad security... Jobst Schmalenbach
- Re: [SLUG] Linux doesn't have bad security... Graeme Merrall
- [SLUG] PHP vs Perl security. Michael Lake
- Re: [SLUG] PHP vs Perl security. Dean Hamstead
- Re: [SLUG] PHP vs Perl security. Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] PHP vs Perl security. Conrad Parker
- Re: [SLUG] PHP vs Perl security. Michael Lake
- Re: [SLUG] PHP vs Perl security. Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] PHP vs Perl security. Graeme Merrall