<quote who="Anand Kumria">
> Likewise kernel packages. Deal with multiple machines and you can compile
> your kernels on one machine and then just transfer one, execute two
> command (dpkg, shutdown -r) and you are done.
Duuuuuuuuuuhhhhhh... Makes perfect sense.
> But how often do you examine every option? Not often I'd wager.
Heh. Don't call me obsessive/compulsive, but... ;)
> make-kpkg uses the tried and tested text based config. BUT it skips
> over questions you seen before, so basically on each kernel rev you only
> have to answer questions which are new to this vesion.
Beautiful. The kind of elegance I've come to expect, really. Wow.
> Herbert is the make-kpkg king -- he does the kernels for Debian releases
> on i386.
:D
Well, thanks Herbert! I'll definitely be using this soon (I have an
application for it in mind already...)
Of course, this will only work with properly packaged kernel sources, right?
- Jeff
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------- http://linux.conf.au/ --
"Boys will be boys, hackers will be hackers, geeks will be geeks,
and cyberpunks will always just be ravers with Macintoshes."
- Monkey Master, Crackmonkey
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
