I agree with this sentiment, but see this as being the precise reason why SLUG should not be fragmented. -- Howard. ____________________________________________________ LANNet Computing Associates <http://lannetlinux.com> "...well, it worked before _you_ touched it!" On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Rodos wrote: > ... but to me SLUG is a community and I > want to sit in the local coffee shop to chat, not have to go into the city > where I don't know anyone and they don't necessarily have the same frame of > reference that I do. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- [SLUG] On the topic of new lists. Rodos
- Re: [SLUG] On the topic of new lists. Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] On the topic of new lists. Rodos
- RE: [SLUG] On the topic of new lists. David Kempe
- RE: [SLUG] On the topic of new lists. Alister Waller
- Re: [SLUG] On the topic of new lists. Howard Lowndes
- Re: [SLUG] On the topic of new lists. Jeff Waugh
- RE: [SLUG] On the topic of new lists. David Kempe
- RE: [SLUG] On the topic of new lists. Jon Biddell
- Re: [SLUG] On the topic of new lists. Crossfire
- Re: [SLUG] On the topic of new lists. Howard Lowndes
- Re: [SLUG] On the topic of new lists. Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] On the topic of new lists. Crossfire
- Re: [SLUG] On the topic of new lists. Matthew Dalton