On 9/28/05, Mike MacCana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 11:17 +1000, David wrote: > > > mutt for speed > > squirrelmail for pictures, html, pdf, other gui crap, etc. > > You might be interested in roundcube. OSS webmail like Squirrelmail, > except it doesn't look like arse. > > http://www.roundcube.net/ > > Mike
I use Mutt and squirrelmail too; strangely, aesthetical considerations are low on my list of priorities. Given that David uses mutt, I suspect they're similarly low on his list of priorities.. so looking "like arse" doesn't give a damn as long as it's stable and does what is needed. Roundcube does look kinda purty.. but it's in alpha, and it uses everyone's favorite toy database for some inexplicable reason. Why does a webmail client need to use a database? If it really must, why doesn't it use a real database? Might suit your needs/wants... I'll stick with Squirrelmail for now -- There is nothing more worthy of contempt than a man who quotes himself - Zhasper, 2005 -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
