I had consider that - my plan is to actually train myself to be
vendor-neutral i.e. familiarise myself with the major distros RHEL,
Suze, Ubuntu so that I can administer them all, but to add the RHEL
specialisation on top of that, mainly because RHEL is apparently viewed
as Number 1 - but I think somebody who can only make a single distro
work is pretty useless.
I think Red Hat certification will inevitably include a degree of
advertising/brainwashing to try to get people to do things there way
purely to differentiate their brand, but I'm old enough to see through Fudd.
How do employers view this - do they assume that serious admins make
sure they are familiar with multiple distroes, and see RHEL
certification as a bonus (i..e. the person knows More), or do they
assume that Red Hat cert means a person knows Less ?
thanks
Rod
On 05/01/11 12:22, onlyjob wrote:
Why Get a Vendor/Distribution *Neutral* Linux Certification?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaGjgdYB1vI
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
