----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 8:43 AM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [smartBridges] Anyone
having issues with the new firmware?
I agree if you feel uncomfortable ordering the units regular
SB AB's but I would think this would be ok just order it direct from nish,
have him assure that the batch you order is a clean batch and that should do
it for you. On the other hand if you are weary of that use the airpoint's
there unaffected.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: John
Hokenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 3:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You might consider using the indoor AirPoint....it's not
suffering from
these issues. As I recall you
want to go on a 300' tower. Consider this
option:
Use the uP controlled amps that have
tunable filters built in and mount the
panel antennas
and amps w/polyphasers on the antenna and radio side up on
the tower, then run 325' of LMR900 from each amp down to the radio
building
with another Polyphaser where the coax enters
the building. This way you
can change out the
radio at any time without climbing the tower. The gain
in the amps will make up the 9.6dB loss in the coax.
3 amps
~$1200
9
Polyphasers ~$360
3 Maxrad sectors
$1170
1000'
LMR900DB $2500
6 LMR900 Connectors
$175
3 N
female to rev SMA pigtails $75
UPS to run radios & DSL
router $200
Misc. Hardware to complete install ~$200
Probably into
this whole thing $6K or less and it's just done with a working
system. I seem to recall you were using DSL as a
backhaul.
JH
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lancaster Networks"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John
Hokenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Saturday, July 19, 2003 11:10 PM
Subject: Re[2]:
[smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware?
> Hello,
>
> Ok, here's a jam now...
>
> I need to have a proposal ready for VP of a 786 employee
ISP by
> Monday, and I can't screw this up! What
equipment do you recommend?
>
> Looks like SB aren't a choice unless they get their problems fixed
and
> stop testing them on consumers
>
> Sunday, July 20, 2003,
1:37:56 AM, you wrote:
>
> JH> Return-Path: <>
> JH>
Received: from [66.150.163.162] (HELO m5)
>
JH> by spamarrest.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.3)
> JH> with ESMTP id 10280714 for cbunting;
Sat, 19 Jul 2003 23:05:08 -0700
> JH> Received:
from part-15.org ([198.63.203.3])
>
JH> by mail.fission2.com
(Merak 5.9.4) with SMTP id CPA74271
>
JH> for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 20 Jul 2003
01:39:37 -0400
> JH> Received: from
natasha.vircom.net [207.1.180.3] by pdqlink.com with
ESMTP
> JH> (SMTPD32-4.07) id
AC902EC0122; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 00:45:52 CDT
> JH>
Received: from rocky ([192.168.250.22])
>
JH> by natasha.vircom.net
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id
h6K5bwj09347
> JH>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 19 Jul 2003
22:37:58 -0700
> JH> Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
JH> From: "John Hokenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> JH> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> JH> References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> JH> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> JH> Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 22:37:56 -0700
> JH> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
JH> Content-Type: text/plain;
>
JH>
charset="iso-8859-1"
> JH>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> JH>
X-Priority: 3
> JH> X-MSMail-Priority:
Normal
> JH> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express
6.00.2800.1106
> JH> X-MimeOLE: Produced By
Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
> JH> Subject:
Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new
firmware?
> JH> Precedence: bulk
> JH> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> JH> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> JH> My rep at Tessco is
making noises about dropping them.
>
> JH> JH
> JH> -----
Original Message -----
> JH> From: "Ray"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> JH> To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> JH> Sent:
Saturday, July 19, 2003 9:10 PM
> JH> Subject:
Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new
firmware?
>
>
> >> My concern is that with all
we've invested in these products (and I
really
> >> like them) distributors might start to drop
them. Think about it, if
you
> >> were Ecomm would you want all this hassle?
> >>
> >> I would
rather SB recall or at least put a hold on all shipments until
> JH> they
> >> get
this issue fixed. I would rather use another CPE product that
works
> JH> so
> >> I don't look like a dumb a** to my clients by using beta
products that
> >> simply aren't yet
ready.
> >>
>
>> I would switch back to SB as soon as the units are again
working.
> >>
>
>> Ray
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original
Message -----
> >> From: "Martin Moreno"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Sent:
Saturday, July 19, 2003 8:20 PM
> >> Subject:
Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware?
> >>
> >>
> >> > I would agree with that!
> >> > I did not catch what Dist they were getting them
from? I get mine
from
>
>> ECOMM
> >> > and they have been
pretty good for the most part. I dont like the
idea
> JH> of
> >> > having a bad unit and they charge your card for the
repalcement ahead
of
>
>> time
> >> > then refund you when
they get the non working one back??? Seems
> JH>
backwards
> >> to me
> >> > I pitched a fit and got them to send me an APPO in
advance exchange
liek
>
>> their
> >> > warranty clearly
states without being charged 1st then charge me if I
> JH> dont
> >> send
> >> > it back within 10 days. This was after I
ordered two new APPO's and
one
> JH> I
> >> > recieved was a
used unit sent back for repair!
> >>
>
> >> >
>
>> >
> >> > Quoting Eje
Gustafsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
>
> >> > > shrug.. Now I am going to
shock this entirely list by finally
agreeing
> >> > > with Chris.. Can't agree more with
what you just said.
> >> > >
> >> > > If they all where bad out of the box
or a lot of them where bad out
of
> >> > > the box it's the distributor/resellers problem
not the
manufacturers
>
>> > > if teh distributor or reseller don't want to work with you
you
might
> >> >
> try to resolve it with the manufacturer if someone gets sued it
should
> >> > > be the
dist not the manufacturer. The manufacturer will not give
you a
> >> > > refund. They sold
the unit for say $10 and you purchased it for $20
>
>> > > from the dist so should the manufacturer give you a refund
for $20
and
> >> >
> lose $10 ??? Come on I think not. If someone should give you a
refund
> >> > > it's
the dist. However if the dist will not work it out then the
> >> > > manufacturer can give you a working
replacement.
> >> > >
> >> > > Best regards,
>
>> > > Eje
Gustafsson
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > The Family Entertainment
Network http://www.fament.com
> >>
> > Phone :
620-231-7777
Fax : 620-231-4066
> >> >
> - Your Full Time Professionals -
> >> > > eBay UserID : macahan
> >> > > ---
>
>> > > searchable smartBridges mailing list archive.
> >> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/smartbridges40part-15.org/
> >> > > --
>
>> > > p> Ok T n T
> >> >
>
> >> > > p> WOW Talk about a
drastic calling for attention in my view, most
of
> >> the
> >> > > p> people on the board are working on
resolving problems and your
> >>
response
> >> > > toa
> >> > > p> firmware issue is that they are
advertised as carrier class and
> JH>
that
> >> > > they
> >> > > p> don't offer cash refunds? Umm does cisco
or lucent? If so I'd
> JH> gladly
> >> like
> >> >
> to
> >> > > p> get my money
back on some AP1000's or CPE Ethernet Converters
and
a
> >> few
>
>> > > p> cisco 350's. A class action suit? Really I have yet
to hear
anyone
> >>
that
> >> > > is
> >> > > p> pissed at the fact that they only
exchange units in a timely
manner
> >> and
> >> > >
wont
> >> > > p> give them there
cash back? Personally I don't recall many groups
>
JH> that
> >> > > will
> >> > > p> do cash refunds from the
primary company isn't this a point to
deal
> >> with
> >> >
> p> your SUPPLIER if you feel you need to return goods cause you
don't
> >> want
> >> > > p> them.
> >> > >
> >> > >
p> As far as I can tell in the past SB has stood behind there
problems
> >> > >
p> including phone calls from half way across the world at 10am to
> JH> help
> >> >
> solve
> >> > > p> MANY users
problems in a one on one basis, they take suggestions
> JH> and
> >> work
> >> > > to
>
>> > > p> help mold there product. Really you have invested
6,000$ wow I
have
>
>> > > spent
> >> > > p>
over 25,000 upgrading my network with SB's powering it and i
have
> JH> yet
> >> to
> >> > > p>
find a reason to neglect the funds spent.
>
>> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > p> AS A NOTE IT SAYS
> >> > >
> >>
> > p> DOA Products must be returned in original condition, and
the
return
> >>
box
> >> > > must
> >> > > p> include all components and originally
packaged with the product,
> >> > >
including
> >> > > p> cable,
software, manual, etc. You must obtain an RMA number
before
> >> you
> >> > > p> return any defective or DOA
products.
> >> > >
> >> > > p> REQUIRES ORIGINAL BOX ON DOA UNITS... DOA
MEANS DEAD ON ARRIVAL
> JH> HENCE
> >> > > YOU
>
>> > > p> JUST GOT IT SO THEY WANT IT BACK HOW THEY SENT IT
SINCE IT WAS
DEAD
>
>> AS
> >> > > SOON
> >> > > p> AS YOU GOT IT.
> >> > >
> >> > >
p> As for the returning on a one to one basis it is not FINE PRINT
it
> JH> is
> >> > > p> blatantly shown in Standard Sized text
under the warranty
> JH> conditions.
> >> > > Not
>
>> > > p> like they used size 1 font to try to hide it from
you.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
p> Sorry if I'm being a di*k but this is just my take on your
comment.
> >> >
>
> >> > > p> Chris
> >> > > p> -----Original
Message-----
> >> > > p> From: Tom
& Toni Maris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> > > p> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003
10:44 PM
> >> > > p> To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
>
> >> > > p> My husband
Tom is very pissed. We have invested more than
>
JH> $6,000.00
> >> in
> >> > > this
> >> >
>
> >> > > p> gear and we are
constantly having prtoblems.
> >> > >
p> On their web site thwy claim to be Carrier Class. Now we read
the
> >> fine
> >> > > print
>
>> > >
> >> > > p> on
the rmapage and it says they will not give refund just
> JH> replacement
> >> > >
units
> >> > > p> and that you have
to have the original box!
> >> > >
p> Original box, replacement unit's, no refunds, Carrier class.
> >> > > p> This SmartBridges company
certainly does not sound like an
honest
> >> > > company.
>
>> > > p> First I would like to know where they get off saying
anything
about
> >>
> > Carrier
> >> > > p>
class.
> >> > > p> Then if they are
so sure about their Carrier class junk, why do
you
> >> need
> >> > > an
> >> >
> p> original box to sned them back, and why don't they do
refunds?
> >> > >
> >> > > p> Tom, has been talking about a lawsuite to
make this Smartbridge
> >> company
> >> > > p> stand behind their products or
give everyone their money back.
He
> >> thinks
> >> >
>
> >> > > p> that their is
probably enough people like us who got ripped off
to
> >> get a
> >> > >
> >> > >
p> class action lawsuite against the company who sold us this pile
of
> >> junk
> >> > >
> >>
> > p> Very very disapointed
> >>
> >
> >> > >
> >> > > p> T n T
>
>> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >>
> >
> >> > >
> >> > > >>From: "Blazen Wireless"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >
> >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > > >>Subject: Re: [smartBridges]
Anyone having issues with the new
> >>
firmware?
> >> > > >>Date: Sat,
19 Jul 2003 19:03:47 -0700
> >> > >
>>
> >> > > >>Okay so it
appears I am not the only one having the problem here
We
> >> hav
> >> > > >>users at begining at 3.5 miles and some
as far as 7.2 miles the
last
> >> > > >>revision 0.01.06 just will not
associate to any of my APS I had
> >>
sugested
> >> > > >>there is
something going on here and I am finally able to get on
> JH> this
> >> > >
list
> >> > > >>and post only to
see what I have been telling support since last
>
JH> week
> >> > >
>>before
> >> > > >>the
release only to be told its been working well in the "LAB"
> >> > > >>
> >>
> > >>Here is my post from another forum these things need to be
tested
in
> JH> a
> >> > > >>consistant manor not just
really close up.
> >> > > >>1.
Measure signal at 1, 2, 3, 4,5 ,6 and 7 miles if possible
> >> > > >>2. At each point do some speed tests to
confirm it is working and
> JH> how
> >> > > well
>
>> > > >>or how bad as you can see at some ares out we get
association but
> >> speeds
> >> > > >>are
>
>> > > >>WAY down.
> >>
> > >>These are only 2 that need to be added to the list of
testing
before
> >>
ANY
> >> > > >>final revision is
released to save time and nerves of those of us
in
> >> the
> >> > > >>field!
>
>> > > >>
> >> > >
>>I keep asking what is the closest and farthest they have been
tested
> >> in
> >> > > the
>
>> > > >>"LAB" and I have yet to get an answer? is this
something that is
a
>
>> > > secret??
> >> > >
>>I too am not going to change firmware on the APPOS that are
working
> >> rock
> >> > > >>solid and have ALL my
customers down.
> >> > >
>>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> We have tried it (ver
0.01.06 rev 3 final release )and I have
seen
> >> > > >>problems
> >> > > >>but to be fair we still need to
identify if this firmware is
> >>
compatible
> >> > > >>with
> >> > > >>the OLD atmel chip they had.
We tried this new firmware on the
only
> >> radio
> >>
> >
> >> > > >>we
> >> > > >>have left since the other 2
locked up hardcore and are now
doorstops
> >> > > after
>
>> > > >>doing firmware upgrades with rev 2 & rev 3 just
before the final
> >> release.
> >> > > >>
>
>> > > >>Here is what we found after 3 hours of testing and
we found the
same
>
>> > > thing
> >> > >
>>on rev 2
> >> > >
>>
> >> > > >>I don't how
you guys feel about it and maybe this firmware is not
> >> > > >>compatible
>
>> > > >>with the old good atmel chip per say.
> >> > > >>The two test radios that
locked up we just bought less then a
month
> >> ago so
> >>
> >
> >> > > >>I
> >> > > >>can only assume they had the
problem. Unless they can come up
with a
> >> way
> >> >
> to
> >> > > >>positively
identify which units are suspect with the suspect
chip.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>I suggest you do the same
tests with a spare radio that you can
> JH>
afford
> >> to
>
>> > > >>lose if the firmware upgrade goes bad. Basically
what happens is
the
>
>> > > radio
> >> > >
>>locks up and it no longer gives an Ethernet connection to log
into
> JH> the
> >> > > >>radio, the power and wireless light
stay on solid and you no
longer
> >> get a
> >> > >
>>LAN connection or light many times I was told to reset and
don't
see
> >>
how
> >> > > >>that would work
since that just resets passwords and the IP
address
> >> etc
> >> > > but
> >> >
> >>I tried 20 times anyways they even sent me a utility to unlock
it
> JH> but
>
>> > > that
> >> > >
>>was useless because you need a network connection to the radio
> JH> hahaha.
> >>
> > >>
> >> > >
>>Anyways in a nut shell the firmware after testing as you can
see
in
> >>
our
> >> > > >>notes does not
work for us yet Smart bridges claims it works well
in
> >> the
> >> > > >>lab
>
>> > > >>and others have tested as well which I would like
to know how far
> JH> away
> >> > > they
> >> >
> >>tested the radio.
> >> > >
>>
> >> > > >>1. ver
0.01.04 loaded originally on this unit and at 3.5 miles we
> >> > > associate
> >>
> > >>fine and get download speeds in 900kbps to 1.2 megs
> >> > > >>
>
>> > > >>2. Loaded ver 0.01.06 final rev into radio it loads
fine and at
same
> >>
3.5
> >> > > >>mile location we
get not even half the speeds we did with rev
>
JH> 0.01.04
> >> we
> >> > > >>get
>
>> > > >>200kbps to 300kbps at most and have lots of packet
loss.
> >> > > >>RSSI 85% and
signal quality 90-95% with both firmware.
>
>> > > >>
> >> > >
>>3. Moved to 5 mile location ran same speed tests with firmware
> JH> 0.01.04
> >>
> > get
> >> > > >>speeds
of 800kbps consistently loaded ver 0.01.06 final revision
and
> >> we
> >> > > >>associate but thats it radio will not
ping APPO on tower but we
can
> >> ping
> >> > >
>>ABO
> >> > > >>radio with
new firmware. RSSI 80% signal quality 80% with both
> >> firmware.
> >> > >
>>
> >> > > >>So as you can
see this firmware will not work for us. I don't
>
>> understand
> >> > >
>>what happened it seems that this is now possibly a timing
issue?
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>The only question I have is
will version 0.01.06 work on old
radios
> >> with
> >> >
> >>old
> >> > > >>atmel
chip? and if not then we will proceed further to load the
> >> 0.01.06
> >> > >
on
> >> > > >>clients radios but
once again we have no way of telling which
radios
> >> have
> >> > > >>new or old atmel chip?
> >> > > >>
> >>
> > >>Our coverage area begins at 3.5 miles and runs
> >> > > >>out to 7.2 miles.
> >> > > >>
>
>> > > >>----- Original Message -----
> >> > > >>From: "Colorado Wisp"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > >
>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 1:18 PM
> >> > > >>Subject: RE: [smartBridges]
Anyone having issues with the new
> >>
firmware?
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
>
>> > > >>Nish,
> >> >
> >>
> >> > > >>We
updated several of one of our "overheating" units this morning
> JH> and
> >>
it
> >> > > >>will not associate
with our APs running 1.4j.5. We have no plans
to
> >> > > update
> >> > > >>the firmware on the APs, they
have been rock solid. Is there
going
> JH> to
> >>
be
> >> > > >>firmware that will
interact this firmware version?
> >> >
> >>
> >> > >
>>Chris
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>---
> >> > > >>Colorado WISP llc. http://www.cowisp.net
> >> > > >>Bringing high speed internet
to rural communities.
> >> > >
>>P.O. Box 55
> >> > >
>>Wellington, Colorado 80549
> >>
> > >>970-218-5295
> >> > >
>>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>-----Original
Message-----
> >> > > >>From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > >
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> > > >>On Behalf Of Nish Park
> >> > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003
2:49 AM
> >> > > >>To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > >
>>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new
> >> firmware?
> >>
> > >>
> >> > >
>>
> >> > > >>Tim,
> >> > > >>Can you please elaborate a
little more on this "still doing the
same
> >> > > >>thing!". What was the
problem, new unit (June or July purchase?),
>
JH> RSSI
> >> > > and
> >> > > >>LQ values, Brand of
AP?
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>We have confirmed that the problem of
loosing association at
> JH> elevated
> >> > > >>temperature has been solved.
This has been the focus of all our
> >>
efforts
> >> > > and
> >> > > >>we are quire confident that issue no
longer exist. Now we will be
> >> > >
focusing
> >> > > >>on testing if
there has been any other side effects.
> >>
> > >>
> >> > > >>
>From some of the emails it appears that some of you are trying
to
> >> see
> >> > > >> >if
>
>> > > >>the new F/W also fixes the old/lingering problem of
"periodic
> JH> lockup".
> >> I
> >> > >
>>will be pleasantly surprised to hear that it does, but that has
not
> >> been
> >> > > >>the
> >> > > >>focus of the current activity on
hand.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>Thanks for your
support.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>Nish
> >> > > >>
> >>
> > >>
> >> > >
>>
> >> > > >>-----Original
Message-----
> >> > > >>From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > >
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> > > >>On Behalf Of Tim
Harris
> >> > > >>Sent: Saturday,
July 19, 2003 12:32 PM
> >> > >
>>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> >>
> > >>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the
new
> >> firmware?
> >> > > >>
> >>
> > >>Yep, I installed it this afternoon on a client's unit.
Had to
> JH> unplug
>
>> it
> >> > > to
> >> > > >>get it to start working after
uploading the new firmware.
Started
> >> > > working
> >>
> > >>fine.
> >> > >
>>
> >> > > >>Customer
called back an hour later and left two messages, still
> JH> doing
> >> the
> >> > > >>same thing!
> >> > > >>
> >>
> > >>If it smells like it, if it looks like it........
> >> > > >>
>
>> > > >>Hmm, maybe the guy with the Hotmail address might
have a point.
> JH> This
> >> > > seems
> >>
> > >>to be getting ridiculous.
>
>> > > >>
> >> > >
>>I'm doing two more tomorrow morning, I'll post a response
then..
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
>
>> > > >>Tim Harris, Operations
>
>> > > >>www.dwisp.net
> >>
> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>----- Original Message
-----
> >> > > >>From: "Sam"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > >
>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> > > >>Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:09 AM
> >> > > >>Subject: [smartBridges]
Anyone having issues with the new
firmware?
> >> > > >>
>
>> > > >>
> >> > >
>> > Has anyone installed the new firmware? I'm getting ready
to
try,
> >>
but
> >> > > >> > wanted to
check first to see what sort of luck others have
had.
> >> > > >>
>
> >> > > >> >
Thanks
> >> > > >> >
Sam
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges
Discussion List
> >> > > >> >
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(in the body type
subscribe
> >> > > >>smartBridges
<yournickname>
> >> > > >>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type
> >> unsubscribe
> >> > > >>smartBridges)
> >> > > >> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
>> > > >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> > > >>The
PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> >>
> > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe
> >> > >
>>smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> JH> (in
> >> >
> the
> >> > > >>body type
unsubscribe
> >> > >
>>smartBridges)
> >> > >
>>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
>> > > >>
> >> > >
>>
> >> > > >>The
PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> >>
> > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe
> >> > >
>>smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> JH> (in
> >> >
> the
> >> > > >>body type
unsubscribe smartBridges)
> >> > >
>>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
>> > > >>
> >> > >
>>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> >> > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe
> >> > >
>>smartBridges <yournickname>
>
>> > > >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type
unsubscribe
>
>> > > >>smartBridges)
> >>
> > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
>> > > >>
> >> > >
>>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> >> > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe
> >> > >
>>smartBridges <yournickname>
>
>> > > >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type
unsubscribe
>
>> > > >>smartBridges)
> >>
> > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
>> > >
> >> > >
p>
_________________________________________________________________
> >> > > p> The new MSN 8: smart spam
protection and 2 months FREE*
> >> > >
p> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> >> > >
> >> > >
p> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> >> > > p> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe
> >> > > p>
smartBridges <yournickname>
> >> >
> p> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type
> JH> unsubscribe
> >> > > p> smartBridges)
> >> > > p> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
>> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by
Declude Virus]
> >> > >
> >> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges
Discussion List
> >> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe
> >> smartBridges
> >> > > <yournickname>
> >> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type
unsubscribe
>
>> > > smartBridges)
> >> >
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
>> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Martin
Moreno
> >> > Blazen Wireless
> >> > 909-907-4106
>
>> > www.blazenwireless.com
> >>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
>
>> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe
> >> smartBridges
<yournickname>
> >> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type unsubscribe
> >>
smartBridges)
> >> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
>> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> >> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>
>> Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date:
7/11/2003
> >>
>
>> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> >> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe
> JH> smartBridges
<yournickname>
> >> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type unsubscribe
> JH> smartBridges)
> >> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
> JH> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges
Discussion List
> JH> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe
smartBridges
<yournickname>
> JH> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> JH> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Chris Bunting, MCSE
>
President
> Cellular: 717-278-6639
> Nextel ID: 196*50*18726
>
--------------------------------------------------------
> Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer
>
A+ Hardware Certification
> 3com NBX Certified
Technician
>
--------------------------------------------------------
> Lancaster Networks
> 1085 Manheim
Pike
> Lancaster PA 17601
> 717-735-2279
>
www.lancasternetworks.com
>
--------------------------------------------------------
>
> NOTICE: This Email message and
all attachments transmitted with it may
contain
proprietary information intended solely for
> the
use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other
use of this
message or its attachments is strictly
prohibited. If
> you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender
immediately
by electronic mail at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
delete this message and all copies and backups
thereof. Thank you.
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe
smartBridges
<yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked
by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.502
/ Virus Database: 300 - Release Date:
7/18/2003
