|
I'm
wondering why sB didn't just do a recall and replace the units that were
affected. If there were only 2,000 units, it seems that this would have
been a much better solution instead of taking the PR hit that this is
causing. I would think that this would only take a couple of days of
manufacturing to accomplish. This would have also saved the time and
effort involved in trying to "fix" a batch of bad units in the field. The
affected units are still going to be in the field and will always be susceptible
to any new "fixes" designed for the "good" units.
Jerry
Fisher
|
Title: Message
- RE: Re[3]: [smartBridges] F... Kevin Summers
- [smartBridges] New Firmware... Eric Helm
- Re: [smartBridges] New Firm... John Hokenson
- RE: [smartBridges] New Firm... sB Tech Support
- RE: Re[3]: [smartBridges] F... sB Tech Support
- RE: Re[3]: [smartBridges] F... Scott Damron
- Re: Re[3]: [smartBridges] F... John Hokenson
- RE: Re[3]: [smartBridges] F... Scott Damron
- RE: Re[3]: [smartBridges] F... Sevak Avakians
- RE: Re[3]: [smartBridges] F... Scott Damron
- RE: [smartBridges] Why not ... Jerry Fisher
- RE: [smartBridges] Why not ... Tom Haynes
- RE: [smartBridges] Why not ... Jerry Fisher
- RE: Re[3]: [smartBridges] F... Sevak Avakians
- RE: Re[2]: [smartBridges] Firmware Issue Joe
- Re[4]: [smartBridges] Firmware Issue Barry at Mutual Data
- RE: Re[3]: [smartBridges] Firmware Issue Laurence Laforga
- Re: Re[3]: [smartBridges] Firmware Issue Stuart Pierce
- RE: Re[3]: [smartBridges] Firmware Issue Laurence Laforga
