It's in beta, it was in an email from smartBridges tech support.

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Sevak Avakians <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  22 Jul 2003 11:45:23 -0400

>SB TECH Support:
>
>WHERE THE HECK IS THE FIRMWARE UPGRADE AS ANNOUNCED IN THE CUSTOMER
>ADVISORY?!?!  Why is this not on the APPO support pages at
>http://www.smartbridges.com/new/support/app.php ???   Last Firmware
>version in those pages is version 1.4.j.6 of 4 June 2003, not July and
>this is listed under airPoint-PRO version 1.50!
>
>Why is it that under the "Known Issues" in these pages, nothing is
>mentioned about the problems that everyone seems to be having??
>
>Sevak
>
>
>On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 11:22, Dan Petermann wrote:
>
>> Temperature affects all electronics to some degree or another. This is just 
>> a guess.
>> I suspect that the "bad" Amtel chips are just barely within standard 
>> SmartBridge specification
>> for that circuit. Once the unit heats up, the timing skews enough that the 
>> input or output
>> of the chip is no longer within the timing window. The end result is that 
>> the data cannot be
>> used due to it is not there when the circuit is looking for it.
>> 
>> Unplugging the unit will cool the chip enough to bring it back into spec. 
>> for a while.
>> 
>> I ran into situations like this working for a manufacturer of remote 
>> controlled spectrum
>> analyzers for cable TV plants (Cheetah Systems). 1 inductor from 1 
>> manufacturer on the
>> main tuner board was bad. Eliminating that 1 part jumped our output by 60%. 
>> If you measured
>> the part it was in spec., once hot it would totally screw up the filter 
>> response. After this
>> incedent ALL of the finished product went thru a 24 hour "burn in" period 
>> and then was
>> recalibrated. The RMA''s dropped to virtually zero.
>> 
>> Thankfully none of our IC's, FPGA's or processors had this problem.
>> 
>> Kudo's to the SmartBridge team for finding this. I know it must have been a 
>> Tylenol moment!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> At 10:07 PM 7/21/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>> >Hello Dan,
>> >
>> >So explain why heat is affecting it?  And why the long power down
>> >time?
>> >
>> >Barry
>> >
>> >Monday, July 21, 2003, 7:18:10 PM, you wrote:
>> >
>> >DP> If you had read the archives you would have found out that it is not
>> >DP> "flaky" hardware but a timing issue.
>> >DP> Big difference. Amtel changed the specs of the chip and SB had to change
>> >DP> the firmware to compensate.
>> >DP> If you have been in the business as long as you say then you know that 
>> >this
>> >DP> is possible.
>> >
>> >DP> Dan Petermann
>> >DP> Wyoming.com
>> >
>> >
>> >DP> At 06:36 PM 7/21/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>> > >>Hello sB,
>> > >>
>> > >>This is not the response I want to see or hear about a product that is
>> > >>in my network. "MAGIC" is BS when the customer quits telling me they
>> > >>are always down.
>> > >>
>> > >>I don't believe for an instant that "firmware" is fixing an
>> > >>overheating issue. I was trained as an Electronics Tech and have 12
>> > >>plus years of fixing electronics to the board level as experience.
>> > >>Adding some code is not going to change a flaky component. Basically
>> > >>is the firmware degrading the radio operation to the point the
>> > >>component does not overheat?
>> > >>
>> > >>Fortunately, I only have a few SB products left in the system plus the ones
>> > >>in the junk box.
>> > >>
>> > >>Barry
>> > >>
>> > >>Monday, July 21, 2003, 2:05:44 PM, you wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>sTS> I know this is hard to believe. Sometimes when you try to associate to
>> > >>sTS> AP that has no WEP enabled, it tell you to check the 
>> > authentication and
>> > >>sTS> WEP, try do a power cycle the unit or reboot the PC, it may work then.
>> > >>sTS> It is just a magic trick.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>sTS> Alex
>> > >>
>> > >>sTS> sB Tech Support
>> > >>
>> > >>---
>> > >>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>> > >>
>> > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
>> > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
>> > >>smartBridges <yournickname>
>> > >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
>> > >>smartBridges)
>> > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>> >
>> >
>> >DP> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
>> >DP> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe 
>> >smartBridges <yournickname>
>> >DP> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe 
>> >smartBridges)
>> >DP> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>> >DP> ---
>> >DP> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Best regards,
>> >  Barry                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >---
>> >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>> >
>> >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
>> >To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe 
>> >smartBridges <yournickname>
>> >To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe 
>> >smartBridges)
>> >Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>> 
>> 
>> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
>> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
>> <yournickname>
>> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
>> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  
>> 
>> 
>
>
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net]

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to