I'm confused about the terminating cat5 on the TR-CPE? You say it's not
standard?  The female plug is built into the unit and you just make a
male-male cable that plugs in to their POE injector...How is it not
standard?  I am assuming the TR-311 units are different?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 4:40 PM
Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Tranzeo/Smartbridges


> > Tim,
> >
> > What was the reason you RMA'd the Tranzeo units?  I've been
> troubleshooting
> > a random lockup issue on the first three of my initial 12 TR-311 units.
> I'm
> > afraid to open the rest....So far, Tranzeo has blamed everyting but the
> > TR-CPE's (Mostly they say it must be the SB AP's) They did go the extra
> mile
> > and order an SB APPO to try to duplicate the issue in their lab however,
> it
> > has been without success.  I'm not buying that an AP could cause a CPE
> to
> > lockup so bad that you can't even get the ethernet to work without a
> reset.
>
> Mine wasn't locking up, it was dead in the water. If it did get anything,
> it was dropping 80% of the packets. The guy (Todd? Tyler? Troy? T...?)
> said that it was probably a bad capcitor. Truth be told, I think the
> problem started when my installer snipped the CAT5 plug, ran it into the
> home, and reterminated it using standard T568b ..which is NOT what the
> Tranzeo unit uses (Why, oh why, I'll never know! If anyone's planning on
> using a Tranzeo unit, just keep that little tidbit in mind. I hate to
> sound like an imbecille, but I should think a bright yellow sticker should
> be included with each unit saying "WARNING: This unit uses a non-standard
> CAT5 termination"). The thing actually worked for a while before we found
> out the problem and reterminated it. It worked thereafter, but was
> horribly loosing packets. I pulled it out and replaced it with a sB
> indoor. (Note to the Tranzeo lurkers: the sB made some improvement, but
> not much. Turns out the 40' mast still didn't give us the LOS we needed).
>
> I brought the Tranzeo back to the shop and played around with it. It
> worked off and on, but never reliably. I RMA'd it and they were quick in
> sending the replacement unit (2nd Note to Tranzeo lurkers: I won't mention
> what was up with the 2nd unit. Let's just keep it our little secret, eh?
> ;)
>
> The unit is working fine as far as I know. Other than the little twerp
> (and I use the term nicely) aiming it in the wrong direction, it's been
> good. I'm not aware of any issues with it, but I'm not monitoring it like
> I am with my sB units. I *think* I've tried it out with 3 of my APs and
> its worked just fine.
>
> (3rd note to Tranzeo lurkers:
> -how about support for MRTG or some other graphical stats stuff?
> -any possibility for site survey tools on the CPE? I can't get the 2015 to
> do a site survey and list all my APs)
>
> I'll be buying Tranzeo again.
>
>
> > Tranzeo claims no one except myself has ever reported this issue, I'm
> hoping
> > maybe you might have some info.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mike Saathoff
> > Neighborlink Wireless
> >
>
> Tim Foster
> www.AledoBroadBand.com
> Aledo's only high-speed ISP
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to