I do it for all clients. I would guess that if it is necessary then it will be necessary for all.
Peter Loop Scorpio Ltd providers of Ledbury Broadband and Highnam Broadband www.ledburybroadband.co.uk www.highnambroadband.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Helm Sent: 31 July 2003 18:26 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Smartbridge APPO max client associations? Does RTS need to be specified on every client for this to take effect? Or can I try one at a time? When I kick off half of the clients, my throughput goes back up to the 2 Mbps range, but with 35 on there, the throughput goes down again. I guess I will add a 3rd APPO to offload the clients. Eric ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:20 PM Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Smartbridge APPO max client associations? > Just be aware that RTS needs to be set on the client devices. Don't set it on > the AP. Leave the AP at 2346 (RTS disabled). > > Craig > > > Quoting Kevin Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > In a crowded environment RTS being lowered can help because > > it allows a client radio to send a Request To Send to the AP > > and the AP tells everyone else to shut up while the client > > sends off it's packets. Something like 1024 would be a good > > test setting to start with just to see if it would help. > > > > The Frag Threshold tells the AP to break up the packets when > > the exceed the specified size. That causes more (but smaller) > > packets to be sent through the air, allowing for more clients > > to get data through. > > > > Typically you want to only adjust one at a time to see which > > one is going to be that little bit of "Magic" for your particular > > situation. > > > > Kevin Summers > > KISTech Internet Services Inc. > > www.kistech.com > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Helm > > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:29 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Smartbridge APPO max client associations? > > > > > > RTS and Frag are both set at 2346... not sure what this does or means? any > > explanation and example of what changing these values does would be great. > > > > Thanks, > > Eric > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: phantam > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:21 AM > > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Smartbridge APPO max client associations? > > > > > > 35 should work matters if the RTS and frag are all tweaked or are they all > > talking at the same time? The clients that is. I have about 28 on my pop's > > and we had swore at one point not to go above 25 on our site hence we're > > upgrading personally we don't use splitters its another point of failure > > but > > it should work with the amp none the less. It really depends on use the > > 11mb > > RF is aggregate and shared so if everyones on or all the radios are talking > > or evne the majority there going to go nuts. > > Chris > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Eric Helm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:04 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > What is the max client associations on an APPO without comprimising the > > performance of the throughput? > > I have 1 APPO that has 35 clients on it, and 1 APPO that has only 5 > > clients... the lesser of the two can get 2 Mbps throuput, which is what we > > are feeding it from the backhaul, however on the APPO with 35 clients, the > > max throughput I can get is about 700 to 800 Kbps. The setup is as > > follows: > > 1 APPO --> .5 Watt Amp --> Splitter --> 2 - 120 degree sector antennas. > > 1 APPO --> 1 - 120 degree sector antenna > > The APPO experiencing throughput problems it the one that has the splitter > > on it.. could this be causing the problem? We just purchased the WISP that > > setup the APPOs and I am not opposed to adding a 3rd APPO if that would be > > a > > viable solution, but I am concerned if 35 clients is going to hinder the > > performance that much. > > Thanks, > > Eric > > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > smartBridges <yournickname> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > > smartBridges) > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges > > <yournickname> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > > smartBridges) > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
