For the most part you'll have to play with it and see what happens. There isn't a tried and true set of settings that will work for everyone's situation.
Kevin Summers KISTech Internet Services Inc. www.kistech.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Blazen Wireless > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Smartbridge APPO max client associations? > > > could I do settings at both to tweak it even further? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kevin Summers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:03 PM > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Smartbridge APPO max client associations? > > > > Correct. RTS would be available on the AP for when it's acting as a CPE. > > Fragmentation can be set at the CPE or the AP or both. It depends > on which direction the larger packets are coming from. If it's > the customer's downloading a lot, set it on the AP to break up the > packets. If it's uploads, set it at the CPE to break them up there. > > Kevin Summers > KISTech Internet Services Inc. > www.kistech.com > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Blazen Wireless > > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:54 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Smartbridge APPO max client associations? > > > > > > Isn't 2347 disabled?? or what is that # for even thought it > says max I was > > told 2347 shuts RTS off? can someone verify that because it > will allow you > > to put 2347 in the setting. This also helps me now because I was > > questioning > > if you had to change the RTS on the AP as well? what about > > fragmentation on > > the AP so you mess with that or leave it at 2346? I am assuming that the > > settings are there for when you use an APPO in client bridge mode > > correct?? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:20 AM > > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Smartbridge APPO max client associations? > > > > > > Just be aware that RTS needs to be set on the client devices. > > Don't set it > > on > > the AP. Leave the AP at 2346 (RTS disabled). > > > > Craig > > > > > > Quoting Kevin Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > In a crowded environment RTS being lowered can help because > > > it allows a client radio to send a Request To Send to the AP > > > and the AP tells everyone else to shut up while the client > > > sends off it's packets. Something like 1024 would be a good > > > test setting to start with just to see if it would help. > > > > > > The Frag Threshold tells the AP to break up the packets when > > > the exceed the specified size. That causes more (but smaller) > > > packets to be sent through the air, allowing for more clients > > > to get data through. > > > > > > Typically you want to only adjust one at a time to see which > > > one is going to be that little bit of "Magic" for your particular > > > situation. > > > > > > Kevin Summers > > > KISTech Internet Services Inc. > > > www.kistech.com > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Helm > > > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:29 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Smartbridge APPO max client associations? > > > > > > > > > RTS and Frag are both set at 2346... not sure what this does or > > means? any > > > explanation and example of what changing these values does > > would be great. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Eric > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: phantam > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:21 AM > > > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Smartbridge APPO max client associations? > > > > > > > > > 35 should work matters if the RTS and frag are all tweaked or > > are they all > > > talking at the same time? The clients that is. I have about 28 > > on my pop's > > > and we had swore at one point not to go above 25 on our site > hence we're > > > upgrading personally we don't use splitters its another point > of failure > > > but > > > it should work with the amp none the less. It really depends > on use the > > > 11mb > > > RF is aggregate and shared so if everyones on or all the radios are > > talking > > > or evne the majority there going to go nuts. > > > Chris > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Eric Helm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:04 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > What is the max client associations on an APPO without > comprimising the > > > performance of the throughput? > > > I have 1 APPO that has 35 clients on it, and 1 APPO that has only 5 > > > clients... the lesser of the two can get 2 Mbps throuput, which > > is what we > > > are feeding it from the backhaul, however on the APPO with 35 > > clients, the > > > max throughput I can get is about 700 to 800 Kbps. The setup is as > > > follows: > > > 1 APPO --> .5 Watt Amp --> Splitter --> 2 - 120 degree sector > antennas. > > > 1 APPO --> 1 - 120 degree sector antenna > > > The APPO experiencing throughput problems it the one that has > > the splitter > > > on it.. could this be causing the problem? We just purchased > > the WISP that > > > setup the APPOs and I am not opposed to adding a 3rd APPO if > > that would be > > > a > > > viable solution, but I am concerned if 35 clients is going to > hinder the > > > performance that much. > > > Thanks, > > > Eric > > > > > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > > smartBridges <yournickname> > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > > > smartBridges) > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > smartBridges > > > <yournickname> > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > > > smartBridges) > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > > > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > smartBridges <yournickname> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > > smartBridges) > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > smartBridges <yournickname> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > > unsubscribe smartBridges) > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > smartBridges <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > smartBridges <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > unsubscribe smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
