On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Marsell K <mars...@joyent.com> wrote:
> > If that weren't the case, I wouldn't have done what I was doing, because > I'd be reducing the lifetime of my ZIL devices by 90% or more. > > I don't follow. You will reduce your slog's SSD endurance by using it for > other things too, which is apparently what you're trying to do? > > Yes, but the "other things" I want to use it for, L2ARC, are strongly read-intensive. Only P/E cycles induce wear on an SSD, not repeated reads of data that's already in the device. So, the vast majority of the "wear" on an SSD that's split between ZIL and L2ARC is going to come from the ZIL side of things. I haven't done the numbers, but I'd strongly suspect that ZIL would generate at least an order of magnitude more writes to the device than L2ARC, over the same time period. In any case, I will merely point out that Joyent has never used mirrored > SSDs for the slog, albeit we made sure to use a quality SSD. You can see a > series of Joyent BOMs here: https://eng.joyent.com/manufacturing/bom.html > > So, what happens to that last ~5 seconds of data that you *thought* was safely committed to your zpool if your non-mirrored quality SSD does in fact glitch out and die, never to be seen again? > > Marsell > ------------------------------------------- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
