On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 04:16:27PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > On 08/08/2011 03:56 PM, Robin Holt wrote: > >> commit 65bb8b060a873fa4f5188f2951081f6011259614 > >> Author: Bhaskar Upadhaya <[email protected]> > >> Date: Fri Mar 4 20:27:58 2011 +0530 > > > > On a side note, that commit fixes up "fsl,flexcan-v1.0" > > ... > > + do_fixup_by_compat_u32(blob, "fsl,flexcan-v1.0", > > + "clock_freq", gd->bus_clk, 1); > > > > Should I go back to flexcan-v1.0 in my patches? > > Well, no. Let's wait. I don't think we need it. Also, it sets > "clock_freq" while > > > http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.0.1/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt > > documents "clock-frequencies"... :-(.
You answered a different question that I was asking. I was asking if I should change fsl,flexcan back to fsl,flexcan-v1.0 as documented on line 5. The clock_freq looks like a uboot change will need to be made as well. Robin _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
