On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Robin Holt <[email protected]> wrote: > Grant, > > Earlier, you had asked for a more specific name for the compatible > property of the Freescale flexcan device. I still have not gotten a > more specific answer. Hopefully Marc can give you more details about > the flexcan implementations.
If there is no ip core version, then just stick with the fsl,<soc>-flexcan name and drop "fsl,flexcan". Marketing may say flexcan is flexcan, but hardware engineers like to change things. Trying to be too generic in compatible values will just lead to problems in the future. g. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
